Search results

Does he need to behave nicely when playing against Juve through his whole career or just for as long as Juve co-own him?

It's an outrage. Everyone should just lie down and let Juve do whatever they want.

Thread moved.

Back, waiting to be sent somewhere, I think.

Meh. How many of the next big things out of South America actually go on to be half as good as they are meant to be?

I wouldn't keep Ekdal this season, though I do quite like him. I would consider keeping Giovinco as a backup, but no more than that, so I understand why Del Neri/Marotta think it better for him to go and get some playing time.

I haven't seen much of Iago, but he doesn't seem to be anything special. Giovinco needs playing time and he won't get that at Juve with Del Piero and Diego ahead of him, so it's better he goes to get playing time. Ekdal is in the same situation as Giovinco. Much better he goes and...

What's the harm in Juve signing a few youngsters and selling them for a profit if they aren't up to playing for Juve?

Are you aware of the dozens of young players big clubs sign every year on the off chance they become good?

Indeed. Best get Marrone and Ekdal out on loan/co-ownership ASAP.

You mean you didn't watch a lot of Siena last season?

Given how few people seem to realise it, I would say yes.

The kid is a genius.

Good for you. :P

Yes.

Zebra, Even if you were owned by Juve and the time and you got a call from the Juve coach suggesting you might want to take it easy during the game? Difficult situation for a young player to be in.

:agree: In Scotland, a player can't play against the club that owns him.

The most predictable transfer of the summer? :D

Cheers. I'm sure Trez is just fed up at being injured. And Nedved is just Nedved. :D

Probably just because Zanetti and Poulsen were back.