Search results

Sure, I didn't mean to phrase it as narrowly as I did.

I find that watching players is the most effective way of judging their ability. Weird, I know.

I have no interest in individual awards. I'm not going to get into an argument about how good a player Totti is because there is even less chance of people being reasonable about it in the current climate than there usually is.

These are dangerous arguments to make. By bringing up trophies won you leave yourself open to claims that Busquets is one of the best players ever. By bringing up the Ballon d'Or you are implicitly agreeing with who it is awarded to ever year.

Yes.

Didn't Ambrosini only get a one-match ban for going to speak to the ref at halftime in a game this season (presumably to try and influence him to be more favourable to Milan in the second half)? Why has Nedved got a longer ban than that for something that I would consider less serious?

Takes one to know one, to some extent, I suppose.

I don't like what Henry's doing, but I don't see how one can criticise Scholes for helping out Man Utd during an injury crisis.

:stuckup:

Suit and trainers combo. :sergio:

I didn't realise Torino had any living legends.

Was Nedved not asked to do it on a temporary basis before Zaccheroni got the job?

Edoardo Molinari, who is a pro golfer.

The Board may not listen to him, but Agnelli will listen to Nedved and the Board will listen to Agnelli. Nedved should be able to influence things one way or another.

Did you have to die to get it?

To hurt your eyes, so that they end up looking as wonky as Marotta's do.

:agree:

Has your invite not arrived yet?

:turk:

:tup: