Search results

You're right, it's just a story in a book.

This is the biggest mystery known to man in this thread.

I skimmed it, and it's not grounds for objective morality anyway.

So what? If he's right then he says there is objective morality without god. Doesn't help religion at all.

Sure.

Because imposing your moral system on another country is less immoral (in our opinion) than letting the Nazis do what they want to do. Human rights are based on consensus. And as you can see, there are some states that don't participate in this consensus. In any case, the UN is our best...

None. Not right. Opportunity. Correct. Incorrect. Democracy is a way to balance the powers of the people in a country. Earlier types of government, like monarchy, were too oppressive to the major part of the population and resulted in revolutions. Democracy is a much more stable...

Ever heard of North Korea? Myanmar? Noone is stopping them. I never said subjective morality is right. I said morality is a matter of opinion, there is no right.

But there is no proof of this, since we have established that in some cases we can not know what the the objectively moral choice is. So in other words, two alternatives: There is no objective morality There is objective morality, but there is no way to discover it So what's the...

What a liar :D

because it's fun, dammit!

Actually I looked it up for him and pasted the definition.

I Eat Babies seems like my speed