Search results

watch your mouth! :groan:

Good Points :thumb: ....your finally learning how to develope an Argument ;) :D j/k .... Glad you gave your 2 cents about the matter :)

i do stand by my words (the ones you just quoted to be specific), but i think Shadowfax does have a point because i think Juve Already signed with Nike a couple of years ago. in other words, they sidned long before juve signed a contract with Tamoil. it really all depends on what each...

it all depends on what the contract reads....we dont know, so now, i dont know what to think.....both sides have valid points.

I noticed on the tag of my new nike kit, that it says: "Made in Bulgaria"

If it's true that We signed the Nike Deal well before the Tamoil Deal, then i think it's reasonable that juve pay for it....Point taken :) Nike upholding US law is one thing is important.....butt this doesn't mean that we'd have to agree with this law :groan:

good point...i forgot that juve ironed that scudetto patches over the nike logo...

O.K ...there's no question about that. but i think Nike should be held responsible financially since they are the side with the restriction.

Why didn't nike make a problem about it back then when he bought those shares?! Obviously nike had no idea of it because Juve already played the SupperCoppa Italiana Game IN THE US with the Tamoil Sponsor.

Sorry, but i think Nike are dumber and ignorant. If they really give two $hits about US law, They wouldn't have signed with juve to begin with. They should know that Al-Saadi Al-Qaddafi Owns 7% Shares in Juve! :rolleyes: :doh: They are the ones who have the problem, not juve, so nike...

I'm more Pis$ed off about the reason Nike doesn't want Tamoil :groan: (but that's political so i won't go any ferther) Anyway, Screw Nike, if they dont like it, they should tear up the 12 year Contract and compinsate juve for this inconvenience. then Maybe juve could sign a one year Deal...