Search results

okay i don't think i made myself clear. we paid 18 million for a position we were well covered on, when we have other pressing issues. I DONT CARE HOW GOOD HE WAS WITH UDINESE. he was inured for a long time, couldn't participate with preseason training, and he would have taken a long time to...

could have been the down payment for Cavani :(

isla 18 million peluso 4.5 million padion 4 million ?

eyes too far apart. birth mark on left shoulder. 3/10 woulld not sign. unless managing stoke city

only if we have money + if he wants to leave + no competiton from any othe team

yes. it's the reason he has been so hard to sell. no body wants to pay him that much. he is also incredibly overrated

i should add lucio. he was earning 2 million - - - Updated - - - of course not. the thing is if we are not ready now, we will never be. losing trezeguet and del piero were huge losses. and we have not replaced either of them properly.

matri erans 1.6 quag 2 iaquinta 3 melo 2.5 getting rid of themwillcrate a lot of breathign room. plus buffon's lower saalry

oh yes. spend 12 million to bring immobile back. 15 million on youths and another 12 on a back up cb. then maroota will come out with "but we have no money derp"

oh it's okay. let's continue to spend 18 million here and there on fringe injured players. then come out with statements saying how we have no money

can we stop it with the stupid trolling please? grow up bench marchisio and play pogba and you have a good team there

troll al you want. ronaldo's brand name recognition alone is worth the money you would spend. oh and there is also the fact he is the greatest footballer i nthe world

nah bro. he will want 12 million and juventus stadium to be put in his property if he comes here.

if a company is makoing losses, then don't spend 18 million on an injurd fringe player, or 4 million on a back up defender, while resicing the contract you had with one for free

we had no troulbe spending +10 million on a 34 year old has been luca toni that played a whooping 4 games for juventus. but hey we had no cl or new stadium then. things that apparenlty mean less money somehow!

only because pool won't make the cl or be competing for titles any time soon

you are forgetting the fees paid for . caceres 9 million. giovinco 12 million. plus the close to 10 millions or so on youth players. the excuse was we needed to build a team with depth. it is a vaild excuse, but not one we can use come summer. not that llorente comes on a free, and the sqaud...

according to you. every business must use it's own money to do invesments. if this was the case many business' would be bankrupt, or not make advances at all because of not having the capital to do so. i guess no one every heard of borrowing money

seems. feasible to me. especially with the fact that we are avoiding spending any money on llorenete transfer fee. business' borrow money all the time to pay for investments and loans. how do people think we afforded spending on guys like diego, melo and krasic in the first place.

but we don't play 4-3-3 anymore. and he has litch and padion ahead of him in the pecking order. i don't care how good he is. it was insane to agree to pay that much for him consideing we were stacked in that position AND he was injured. i don't want to drag the isla issue here. my point is...