Search results

You are only satisfied with Quag's which makes it most.

It seems you're the one putting words in my mouth as I did not say "all bad".

I am not trying to put anything in your mouth, I am just saying my opinion about your logic. Which in fact you presented to show that the board actually lied and said they loaned players they actually intended to buy. Most of them bad deals.

The only reason behind that assumption is because the board is doing wrong. Doing something wrong does not mean that the deals are as bad as you describe them and this does not make it a well founded speculation.

He is not wrong but he does not have any evidence to support what he is saying is true. It is pure speculations and that's about it.

A loan is a loan, your logic is only to show how bad the current management are.

We got to know that after it happened, no one speculated or came up with what was going on. That second option popped up only to emphasize the ineptness of the current directors and to further show how bad they are.

According to all sources, it is the first option. The second option is something some of the forum members came up with.

So it's just speculations, no?

How do you know that? or how anyone can know that?

What makes you so sure?

Not only that and all reported news about the deals are fake.

So each of the loans are special in their way? I don't buy any of this to be honest. They would not do deals and announce them otherwise, the deals are loans with option to buy and that only means loans with options to buy.

How do you explain De Laurentis' words: "If Juve want to keep Quagliarella, they'll have to settle to the agreed price?"