Search results

It is a possibility, but very unlikely given the fact that it has been made abundantly clear he is not in Conte's plans. Adding a 7th striker in Vucinic should have hammered home that point even further. Not only does he find himself in a situation where he is at a competitive disadvantage...

Not until the next transfer window. Who would want a player who hasn't played or trained professionally in months? As a result, any offers would be short term and at a fraction of the value of what he currently makes.

So he would have been making more money in the long run had he accepted Marseilles' offer. That along with CL football, domestic title challenge, and living on the Mediterranean. He is sticking his middle finger up at the management, as if his motives were purely financial, he would have...

Many teams were interested in him, all of whom were put off by his wage demands. I am not satisfied with Marotta this mercato, but he can't be blamed here. Amauri would be lucky if their was a team willing to offer half his current 4m a season wages. Like Tiago, he is laughing all the way to...

Are we still paying his full wages at Parma? Any loan fee involved?

If Marotta forced the issue, would Amauri have still preferred to stay? Even if Marotta did (I'm not sure he did given his comments), it means nothing when his replacement probably would have been just as useless given the amount of money Marotta was allocated to sign a replacement (0 euros).

I agree. He does a lot of work upfront that doesn't get recognized unless he scores. Hit the post against Chievo and Roma. These same critics would be praising his overall game had those chances went in.