Search results

Whatever dude. The fact that you call him a playmaker is just seemingly a ploy to bash him even more, as if he doesn't perform as such, you'll just bash him for that as well. Just like Nedved isn't a "playmaker," neither is Tiago. Just because he's a good passer of the ball doesn't make him...

He's an all action midfielder who can make the smart passes, be the link between the defense and the main playmaker, and provide good shots from deep. And yes, he can get stuck in and win balls, as seen yesterday. He played with grit and won a ball in the middle of the pitch, setting up...

No, it doesn't clear it up whatsoever. Tiago is fit, played a good match yesterday, and deserves a starting role. End of. Tiago isn't even a playmaker. Again, Vinni, you are way off when it comes to this player.

How the hell can Tiago light up the match after playing only 90 minutes in the last month coming in during the second half of the game? He's not fucking Maradona. We only had 37% of the possession in the match and Tiago created two opportunities that should have been finished, especially by...

Yeah, Tiago didn't do anything really. Him stealing the ball from a Lazio defender and sliding it through to Trezeguet was horrible. Bench him for good.

That's certainly true, brother. But the only way to find out if he's worth the money is to play him, which Ranieri idiotically doesn't want to do. But when we have fielded him, he's looked good. That's why Vinni and the rest of the Tiago haters are wrong.

You can't answer the question. BECAUSE HE FUCKING NEVER PLAYS BECAUSE OF RANIERI.

Vinni, stop hating on Tiago for no reason. He played well today for coming in the second half and only being fielded five other times this season. You can't judge a player on those sort of terms. You most certainly cannot. You were wrong in saying Tiago isn't good enough for Juve, and you're...

Here's what I think: The fact we had only 37% of the possession during the match is appalling to me. That means we sat back far too much and were complacent with the result, which is never good. A side such as Juventus should never have less than 40% of the posession, no matter what the...

:D

Ohhh yeah, that's right. Now I remember. That was a great display of class from our boys. I'd rather see us win 3-0 in such a situation than 9-0, taking advantage of a team or player misfortune. Unless the team deserves a beating for a valid reason, it's stupid to keep on scoring. And...

Refresh my memory Alen... what exactly happened in that match, in relation to this discussion? I can't seem to remember. Funny second thing is that FSC was airing the match as "Greatest Man United Victories." More like greatest disguise act with fecal matter dressed in red.

:D

I'm currently watching Manchester United versus Ipswich Town from 1995 on Fox Soccer Channel. When the match was 7-0 United, the Ipswich keeper came out of his box to intercept a United through ball which landed about 35 yards out from goal. The keeper was adjudged to touch the ball with his...

That is correct, but add on calculus and you've got the whole story. Calculus. :tdown:

Tonight I really should be studying for my final exams in the coming week, but instead I will buy some alcohol and get drunk in the name of Juventus.

No doubt. That trap on the backheel for the second goal was so sweet it was digusting.

Later on, Brother.

Did anybody else get massively turned on whenever Del Piero was trapping the ball tonight?

The exact same sentiments go to you, big guy. :toast: