Search results

City's ban overturned :clap:

I trust whoscored. They say it's 15. 35.5m gross if my math is correct. Costa and Higuain alone in wages 25m gross, much more if we include amortization. Higuain also already prevented us from signing 2 better strikers in the last 6 months with his presence alone (Cavani, Haaland).

He has 15 actually. In 2013 minutes. Which is 23 games roughly. Which is way too low for a poacher who costs 14m gross.

These two are bigger problems. Huge wages, offer nothing, but are supposed to be starters and make the difference.

If possible bring Allegri back. If not only Deschamps from that list. Inzaghi maybe but I'm afraid it's still too early for him with so many old players and unbalanced squad.

I was gonna say it's like Sarri or Martusciello wrote it themselves. My favorite. Like Martusciello said earlier this season:"Unfortunately we've inherited a winning team." Keep in mind this guy wrote it: 1594584502 It's not failure per se, but it's not really a great achievement. They...

You keep going on about totally different things than what I'm saying. I didn't say we should've kept him after it was obvious he wasn't going to play and wanted to leave. I said it was a mistake it got to that point. He played 279 minutes over 6 months. That's a laughable sample size. In more...

No, the problem was we wrote off a decent player before he played a single game, but keep playing worse ones who fit the 'system' even less than him. We're talking about different points of the year. You're talking about how he became unhappy, was 7th choice and had to go. I'm saying it never...

I didn't ignore anything. You said he had market value as opposed to Matuidi and wanted to leave. But he didn't want to leave before being left out and not given a chance. He was useful last year. He's very useful to Dortmund this year. He was useful to Klopp who tried very hard to keep him and...

But Agnelli was adamant after Marotta left that Re, Paratici and some other guy were the future and they would lead Juve in the new era. Where did you see he was risk-averse? 1594578903 Could it be? :green:

Yeah you actually have to explain why he was the obvious choice. Quality-wise he certainly wasn't and he only wanted to leave after being left out of the CL list.

No, it was obvious we needed to sell him once Sarri wrote him off. I'm talking about way before that, he should've started the season as a regular and then sell him if he underperforms. He was decent last season, even great at times and didn't get a chance for anything with Sarri. Excluded from...

He earned his place last season when he became a regular under Allegri. I'd love to hear a reason why he was inadequate and didn't fit in while Matuidi exists.

He's useless. Him and Higuain need to be first out the door.

He played 279 minutes ffs. That's barely 3 games worth of minutes. When exactly was he supposed to earn his place or prove himself? It's unquestionable he was AT WORST our 3rd best mid. He was inexplicably written off before the season even started.

Ofc we have. We have changed for the worse.

Who knows? Maybe? I doubt all the talk last summer was completely made up. I don't doubt we made at least some contact with him to test the waters. Pipe dream would be he said let me try another year for CL here, then I'll get back to you. But then why give Sarri a 3 year contract.

Yeah, someone talked about it the other day in Sarri's thread. Mike I think Basically the guy other members say was on 'Sarri is new coach' boat last summer when everyone talked about Guardiola now says Sarri is gone no matter what results until the end. He also said he doesn't know if that...

I stopped 'trusting' gurus from VS long time ago, but I pray to God Almighty this last source is right. Please, please, please.

Same shit, different package. Good in his comfort zone with no pressure and no expectations, just like Sarri at Napoli. I pray for the day when this trend of hyping up hipster coaches and ex-players with little to no trophies won ends.