Search results

lol, he has been immense for us, time after time. Dont fix what aint broken. We got other BIG worries to deal with.

He plays next to Mandzukic though. Some in here were fapping about how happy Ronaldo must be to play with such a one-man army. So I cant imagine him not enjoying the season.

How the hell is this post controversial and awaiting moderator approval? lol. Im basically stating the facts, that we did a heavy winger upgrade after the use of Mandzukic as an emergency winger, which would seem to suggest that we would prefer real wingers. Its so easy to give continuous and...

I agree with the part in bold, the rest, not really. Controlling a game isnt about filling in as many CMs as possible. Its more about having a game plan, every player having a ROLE and individual tasks, instead of having 5 players overlapping eachother in responsibilities as we see it with...

This is very stupid and not based on anything. It sounds like a logical reasoning, but its not that simple. You are neglecting a lot of parameters. Putting 1 more number in midfield, means taking that player from another line. Pjanic is actually working pretty hard in midfield, running most in...

Thats what I am talking about. We lost 4-1. We got that far despite playing a striker as a winger (due to injuries as well), not because of. That would be hard to prove. We also quickly bought a handful of wingers after that. If that LW-Mario experiment was super amazing, then it would have made...

We should have gotten this fucker just to play the CL games.

Lol, that was one retard 4-2-3-1 lineup. Barzagli on RB and Alves RW, because Allegri pussied out again instead of playing Cuadrado. And Mandzukic on LW, was always a weird setup. No wise person would use that game as evidence that a 4-2-3-1 formation sucks

Lets ask the Mensa panel what they think of such blasphemous statements and ideas: @Gzuz, @Juvenann , @Mr.NoGood , time to shine now and bring your insights forward

I would have thought he would stay in Italy where he is in his comfortzone. Will be interesting to see.

I have been saying this for a year. But been told: 1) Pjanic works best in a 3 man mid 2) No other teams has won with 2 man mid 3) Our mid sucks, so we need extra cover Im happy to see that the tunes are changing in here and that people come around eventually. Another thing I noticed a lot is...

Would be great. Id even hope for him to do well in Serie A, so that we can get some competition back to this poor league.

We need Koulibaly for sure.

Nope, dat you, looking for a signature? Regarding that number, hard to believe. He is old and does never run past any defenders. Could be from a really long and undisturbed sprint back from attack, which would be quite an impressive feat for him. But seems odd.

I think that is what he is explaining. Thats also an interesting decision. That either means that they believe the chance for reaching the CL final is very little, or that Cuadrado would be of no use, compared to a random bench player. Which one would it be?

That should be a simple enough task for you. My guess is that it is MUCH more close than most of you believe.. dropping points, with/without Pjanic

It was Mandzukic who made that goal. That Dybala and Matuidi managed to play through 4-5 men and score, was standard procedure. Luck was involved for the ball to fall for Dybala, but he did everything right on the setup and the finish. It was a good attacking move, but horrible defending. They...

Yeah your posts are really smart.

You are lost, sorry. I explained everything there is to explain in my previous posts, nothing needs to be added, it's all there.

That was not the point I was trying to make, whether or not Pjanic is our best mid among shits. I was interested to see if we ACTUALLY have lost more games without him. We probably have, but Im not sure.