Search results

My bad. I thought you were flying off the handle like you did with Swag the other day. Apologies. :cry:

Me? You're the one insisting on calling everyone with a different position on government transparency "government drones".:lol:

I get it.:D

Andy's gone all Carl Rove. Either you're with us completely or your sheep! I love it!:lol:

He works for HP. It's not surprising a major American company wouldn't want their employees downloading Wikifiles onto their servers.

Yep. It's been public for quite some time.

I said indirectly. If some of what Assange leaked lead to US operatives, soldiers, overseas persons being killed, then he would be in trouble.

Well, considering Assange is using secondary information (he didn't take it himself but got it from a source) and is acting as a media outlet (Wikileaks is considered a media outlet) the distribution of the information is perfectly legal a la the Watergate scandal and the Deepthroat aftermath...

She's an idiot, but she keeps the jokes coming for late night comedians.

Well a lot of people want Palin tried for idiocy.:lol:

Did I say that Martin? USE YOUR HEAD CODER!

Too bad he hasn't broken US law yet.

There are leaks about Israel, a few thousand if I'm not mistaken. However, most are merely diplomatic transmissions. With nothing really degrading, other than how it seems to confirm that they do have influence over US foreign policy the the Middle East.

Of course.

So instead of some silly Aussie, it's now Israel's fault? Simply because the documents are pro-Israel and not so good for Turkey?:D

Everyone would think the US is responsible, obviously.

I think it would be dumb to do that. The whole world would know who was responsible. Which means it's quite likely to happen.

They're diplomatic cables not CIA documents. What do you think "diplomatic cable" means?

Yep. That would be the real wikileak.

I know it's laughable. I actually was making sure it was those guys and not the ones we sent overseas to be "detained" in other countries.:D