Search results

What they were worth in our books less what they were sold for. It's the net loss as far as I know.

My thought the first time I read this was that it was so calculated to omit this call. Not only did it protect Milan (who were already covered by the excuse that Meani was a "nobody" there) but it protected the fairy tale too, the fairy tale of Moggi being the puppetmaster comanding refs...

Don't even watch that show anymore and if they asked me I would decline.

Hurricane Catrina did less damage than Secco Dule...you know where to find me

not a fan

Thanks man

Amazing, when I wrote of Bove's suicide I was told I was full of shit.

Moggi's lawyers intend on proposing the opening of a new and separate investigation at the next trial date regarding Auricchio and the "missing" calls. Looks like Moggi wants to press charges and from the sounds of things the Della Valle boys and Agnelli are intent on doing the same...

Likely both and I’ll add another one. Gazzetta and a few other papers had more than a little say in the 2006 outcome and I think that now they are trying to get in the good books of certain people/teams who may now seek financial restitution for the slanderous way they portrayed the accused...

Amici di Nessuno

I don't trust CONI, leave it at that. I don't really believe financial compensation could come from one of their rulings anyway. It is just a step. They can force a retrial but the matters would remain in the sporting realm and financial shit will likely wind up having to pass through civil...

Attempting to gain an advantage is still article 6. The fact that it didn't happen may be simply because the other party was ethical...doesn't mean the initiator is too. I wrote about the Facchetti Mazzei in the post call but there is a very similar one with Bergamo where much of the same was...

Facchetti at 41 with the article 6 reference regarding him on 61. - Facchetti with Mazzei where Facchetti suggests two specific linesmen for a game. - Facchetti with Bergamo where Facchetti potential referees are discussed regarding the upcoming Juventus-Inter match - Facchetti complains to...

I do't have them on my system but I heard them. They weren't as bad as Inter or Milan but tehy were very similar to teh rest from what I recall

Short answer, they can do whatever they want. Long answer, stop reading FI and other bullshit. They keep saying Inter won’t get the title revoked because of the statute of limitations and it is annoying me how inaccurate they are. The statute is the reason Inter won’t get punished for their...

I take it you never heard Roma's calls.

The confirmation is that the FIGC doesn't feel it is their place to revoke titles...not that Inter deserve it. He's so manipulative it is no wonder that Interisti are confused.

You find giving a thief a stolen title on his birthday fitting? He died of cancer slowly likely related to the steroids Herrera forced him to take in the 60s...I find that way more fitting.

Just states that new evidence can supersede the statute. Won't go to retrial. In Italy rules like that get buried unless someone powerful wants to use it.

He mentioned general behaviour with few examples. He simply said that the tone of the calls were a direct attempt at interfering with the impartiality of the referee realm. I don’t have it all in front of me now (I’m not home) but I recall some of the examples regarding the “little gifts”, the...