[WC] World Cup 2010 - General Talk Thread (50 Viewers)

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
Answer to what? You didn't propose anything useful. Morons this, morons that.

You just sound like a spoilt brat.
You talk as if Australia did something meaningful today. They didn't. They could have been brave and tried to score two more, but they didn't. It's probably the worst display I've seen the entire tournament. France were piss poor, but what kind of mentality is this?
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
They won, how was it a piss poor display.

Don't you think it was an even worser display by Serbia Andries?
No. The Serbs tried. The Australians settled for "perhaps we're not going to qualify, but we won't look as bad back home".

That's wrong. You try to qualify FFS.

You doubt it's an interesting claim?
Why is it interesting?
 

Nicholas

MIRKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jan 30, 2008
38,737
No. The Serbs tried. The Australians settled for "perhaps we're not going to qualify, but we won't look as bad back home".

That's wrong. You try to qualify FFS.
They did they scored 2 goals, what if Germany beat Ghana 3-0 Australia would of qualified :p

I'm just being akward dude ignore me.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,151
You talk as if Australia did something meaningful today. They didn't. They could have been brave and tried to score two more, but they didn't. It's probably the worst display I've seen the entire tournament. France were piss poor, but what kind of mentality is this?
Just because they didn't score... doesn't mean they did not try. Australia had a couple chances after the second goal, one in which Kennedy shot wide. Serbia started to wake up after the second goal and Tosic seemed to get a bit too much space to work, so the Aussies were under more pressure.

You simply make no sense, and are ass-backwards in a number of respects.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 50)