end of the day it was wrong of hiddink to call us cheats and dives, because the ref bought the challenge matrix did, and to any ref in that angle must surely know that was nothing more than a yellow, wen u especially compare that challenge heinze did to the mexican player, that was worthy of a red.
what i also disliked from hiddink was his lack of responsibility in himself of the team's failure to capitalise on the man advantage, he had 40 mins to win the game, with the opportunity handed to him on a silver platter, he waited till 5 min from time to stick on aloisi.
hiddink choked and failed to take the opportunity whilst it was there, but if u ask me justice was done, he robbed us 4 yrs ago of a very controversial ref and wen matrix went off i thought oh god round 2.
as for the peno, without being biased it was a very good decision, why? well lucas neil went to ground far too early inviting grosso, grosso tried to get over him to regain the ball, and it was obvious from the challenge on grosso seconds before he had the intention to play on, but wen grosso went over neil, neil makes contact with him with his left arm, causing an obstruction, it wasnt a dive because contact was made, as that was the case thats y it was a peno, wheather he made a meal of the contact is another matter, but contact was definatly made, so it was a peno.
this morning i had a online verbal dispute with about half of australia explaining this, but obviously they were outraged, not that i cud really understand y, maybe because of their limited knowledge of the game i dont know, but it showed certainly the experience the italians had, keeping a cool head, and getting the job done.
btw is it just me but dont u juventino's judging on matrix's performance in the wc make u wana make a plea to juve to sign him? i flaming well do! he was fantastic in the first half he made 25 successful passes and 1 unsuccessful, wen u compare that to riquelme's passing, riq is put to shame!