Can someone please change the forum clock? It's a few minutes ahead which confuses the hell out of me when we come close to deadline.
Buy on AliExpress.com
The fook is G? (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter JBF
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
It's fine with me but:
Keep your suspicions for someone being a special role for yourself from now on
If you are a C and you are convinced that Sab has a special role why should you share your knowledge with the Gs? :eyebrows:
1- You are a naive C.
2- You are a G.
3- You are a C who thinks he is going to be recruited soon in the game.
Keep your suspicions for someone being a special role for yourself from now on
If you are a C and you are convinced that Sab has a special role why should you share your knowledge with the Gs? :eyebrows:
1- You are a naive C.
2- You are a G.
3- You are a C who thinks he is going to be recruited soon in the game.
It's fine with me but:
Keep your suspicions for someone being a special role for yourself from now on
If you are a C and you are convinced that Sab has a special role why should you share your knowledge with the Gs? :eyebrows:
1- You are a naive C.
2- You are a G.
3- You are a C who thinks he is going to be recruited soon in the game.
Keep your suspicions for someone being a special role for yourself from now on
If you are a C and you are convinced that Sab has a special role why should you share your knowledge with the Gs? :eyebrows:
1- You are a naive C.
2- You are a G.
3- You are a C who thinks he is going to be recruited soon in the game.
Doesn't help the G's any more than it helps the C's. At least not the way I see it:
* if she is a G => we might end up lynching her
* if she is a special C => the bodyguard might end up protecting her (assuming she isn't the BG herself)
I think i agree with you. I will keep my doubts aside for the time being, lets weed out the inactive at least in the first day. First because almost always we lynch a C in the first day, secondly because those inactive posters are doing us no good anyways.
I'm voting for one of the people who won't post at all today.
I'm voting for one of the people who won't post at all today.
Going after an inactive member in the previous two games was gonna mean lynching a G.
Blondu and JBF were the only two inactive at the beginning of the second to last game. I voted JBF and we almost lynched him. He was a G.
If people went after Suns and Kyle on the first days of the last game, again a G would have been lynched.
It sure doesn't mean that the inactive ones in this game will be gangsters. There is always a +70% chance that they aren't Gs. But fuck it. As it's been noticed many time around here, an inactive poster is ruining the game in so many levels.
Blondu and JBF were the only two inactive at the beginning of the second to last game. I voted JBF and we almost lynched him. He was a G.
If people went after Suns and Kyle on the first days of the last game, again a G would have been lynched.
It sure doesn't mean that the inactive ones in this game will be gangsters. There is always a +70% chance that they aren't Gs. But fuck it. As it's been noticed many time around here, an inactive poster is ruining the game in so many levels.
Not at all. How the hell should the BG trust your suspicions over Sabet?
Btw, we won the last game because we had inactive players in our team. Whenever someone wanted to vote them we accused them of voting an inactive player without knowing much about him/her. Suns could survive long in the game only because he wasn't around at all (and this is what we had planned). Let's vote an inactive member, if he/she has a special role then he has to reveal it immediately. Not to forget that we can figure many things looking at the reactions, at the Gs' flow to save someone when he/she is of their group. This might help the Lawyer to save Civilians just like what Sabet did twice (smartly) in the previous game.
Btw, we won the last game because we had inactive players in our team. Whenever someone wanted to vote them we accused them of voting an inactive player without knowing much about him/her. Suns could survive long in the game only because he wasn't around at all (and this is what we had planned
). Let's vote an inactive member, if he/she has a special role then he has to reveal it immediately. Not to forget that we can figure many things looking at the reactions, at the Gs' flow to save someone when he/she is of their group. This might help the Lawyer to save Civilians just like what Sabet did twice (smartly) in the previous game.
Not at all. How the hell should the BG trust your suspicions over Sabet?
Btw, we won the last game because we had inactive players in our team. Whenever someone wanted to vote them we accused them of voting an inactive player without knowing much about him/her. Suns could survive long in the game only because he wasn't around at all (and this is what we had planned). Let's vote an inactive member, if he/she has a special role then he has to reveal it immediately. Not to forget that we can figure many things looking at the reactions, at the Gs' flow to save someone when he/she is of their group. This might help the Lawyer to save Civilians just like what Sabet did twice (smartly) in the previous game.
Btw, we won the last game because we had inactive players in our team. Whenever someone wanted to vote them we accused them of voting an inactive player without knowing much about him/her. Suns could survive long in the game only because he wasn't around at all (and this is what we had planned
). Let's vote an inactive member, if he/she has a special role then he has to reveal it immediately. Not to forget that we can figure many things looking at the reactions, at the Gs' flow to save someone when he/she is of their group. This might help the Lawyer to save Civilians just like what Sabet did twice (smartly) in the previous game.
The BG shouldn't trust my suspicions, yet the G's should. Sorry, you completely lost me there.
Oh, and I'm all for lynching an inactive member the 1st day(s).