Tas..... (1 Viewer)

jugovic

New Member
Apr 18, 2005
4
#1
ciao a tutti, scusatemi se scrivo in italiano ma credo che questa cosa vi faccia molto piacere.......


ON THESE GROUNDS
The Court of Arbitration for Sport gives the following advisory opinion:

Question 1.- :
The use of pharmaceutical substances which are not expressly prohibited by sports law, and which cannot be considered as substances similar or related to those expressly prohibited, is not to be sanctioned by disciplinary measures. However, regardless of the existence or not of any judgement
rendered by a State court, sports authorities are under the obligation to
prosecute the use of pharmaceutical substances which are prohibited by
sports law or any other anti-doping rule violation in order to adopt
disciplinary measures. In such event, any disciplinary action shall take into
account: the substantive norms and rules applicable at the time of the
alleged violation, the “lex mitior” principle, the jurisdiction of the
organisation or body taking such disciplinary action, as well as the statute of
limitations as prescribed by the applicable rules.


Question 2.- :
The use by athletes of pharmaceutical substances which are not included in
the prohibited list, and which cannot be considered as substances similar or
related to those expressly prohibited, is to be investigated by sports
authorities only in order to inform WADA of possible new forms of doping.
With regard to the use of pharmaceutical substances included in the
prohibited list or any other anti-doping rule violation, sports authorities
must resort to all available methods of investigation and must open without
delay a disciplinary proceeding whenever they happen to know of possible
violations from whatever source of information, leaving it up to the
adjudicating bodies to determine whether there is sufficient evidence, in
accordance with the applicable standards of proof, to inflict disciplinary
sanctions.
Lausanne, 26 April 2005
THE COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT
_________________
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
OP

jugovic

New Member
Apr 18, 2005
4
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #4
    Rome, 27 apr. -(Adnkronos) - "The use of pharmaceutical substances which are not expressly prohibited by sports law, and which cannot be considered as substances similar or related to those expressly prohibited, is not to be sanctioned by disciplinary measures." Is the opinion advisory transmitted from the Court Arbitrates of the Sport (Tas) to the Coni. The Tas has answered to the first question place from national the olympic Committee after the sentence of the process of first degree that, to Turin, is closed with the sentence of Agricula Riccardo, medical of the Juventus. The Coni have asked the Tas if the use of substances not express forbidden from the norms sport can be endorsed from a disciplinary point of view.

    sempre forza juve!!!!
     

    Menace

    Senior Member
    Apr 22, 2005
    3,988
    #7
    Juve win doping appeal Wednesday 27 April, 2005

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The international Tribunal of Sport has ruled that Juventus cannot have their trophies taken away after the doping trial.

    The CONI (Italian Olympic Committee) asked for advice from the Lausanne tribunal and was told this evening that the Bianconeri are not culpable on a sporting level.


    “The use of pharmaceutical substances that are not expressly banned by sporting law and that are not similar to illegal substances cannot be punished by disciplinary action,” read the verdict.


    This means that Juventus did not contravene the anti-doping laws and therefore cannot have their trophies taken away, nor be docked points in the current campaign.


    There were fears that once the Turin trial found chief of medical staff Riccardo Agricola guilty of administering excessive pharmaceutical substances, the titles won between 1994 and ’98 would be confiscated.


    The TAS verdict is not legally binding, but it is highly unlikely that the Italian authorities will now seek to take such drastic steps.


    Meanwhile, the doping issue is set to be raised again on Thursday evening, as a RAI Due programme plans to show six-year-old footage of a Parma defender receiving treatment via an injection.


    The player – currently unnamed, but reportedly an international – is heard discussing the substance Neoton with members of the club staff ahead of a European Final. It is a medicine usually given to patients suffering from cardiac problems.
     

    Mark

    The Informer
    Administrator
    Dec 19, 2003
    97,671
    #8
    Juve win doping appeal
    Wednesday 27 April, 2005
    The international Tribunal of Sport has ruled that Juventus cannot have their trophies taken away after the doping trial.

    The CONI (Italian Olympic Committee) asked for advice from the Lausanne tribunal and was told this evening that the Bianconeri are not culpable on a sporting level.

    “The use of pharmaceutical substances that are not expressly banned by sporting law and that are not similar to illegal substances cannot be punished by disciplinary action,” read the verdict.

    This means that Juventus did not contravene the anti-doping laws and therefore cannot have their trophies taken away, nor be docked points in the current campaign.

    There were fears that once the Turin trial found chief of medical staff Riccardo Agricola guilty of administering excessive pharmaceutical substances, the titles won between 1994 and ’98 would be confiscated.

    The TAS verdict is not legally binding, but it is highly unlikely that the Italian authorities will now seek to take such drastic steps.

    Meanwhile, the doping issue is set to be raised again on Thursday evening, as a RAI Due programme plans to show six-year-old footage of a Parma defender receiving treatment via an injection.

    The player – currently unnamed, but reportedly an international – is heard discussing the substance Neoton with members of the club staff ahead of a European Final. It is a medicine usually given to patients suffering from cardiac problems.





    How much you wanna bet that they want to link Cannavaro to a doping scandal now that we were cleared? The substance is fuc*in' legal man. They just want to stir up things again. At least they know that it's not only Juve that took legal stuff during this time.
     

    isha00

    Senior Member
    Jun 24, 2003
    5,114
    #13
    What does it mean we won the appeal? :confused:
    Tas declared us innocent, but Agricola was condemned not by them, but by the Italian justice. I hope this will be important for the actual appeal, though..
    At the moment this thing has passed almost under silence here in Italy. For example Gazzetta.it didn't even write an article about it. So no one will know and (for now) nothing will change :(
     

    isha00

    Senior Member
    Jun 24, 2003
    5,114
    #15
    Yeah, sure. But Tas has not a say in what the Italian justice decides. Coni only asked them an opinion on our situation to decide if they had to fee us or even take our 94-98 titles away.
    Agricola is still condemned to don't-remember-how-many months in prison, or at least he will until the sentece of the appeal in the courthouse of Turin will state the contrary (and it will take years, I'm afraid).
     
    Sep 14, 2003
    5,800
    #16
    It's good news because Tas could've said the opposite, that we must return trophies that we won. The arguement that they used was that we didn't use any substances that at the time were banned.
     

    isha00

    Senior Member
    Jun 24, 2003
    5,114
    #17
    ++ [ originally posted by Holdon ] ++
    It's good news because Tas could've said the opposite, that we must return trophies that we won. The arguement that they used was that we didn't use any substances that at the time were banned.
    Yeah, I agree.
    I just wanted to say that this decision won't change anything of the trial and the sentence.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)