Shocking images of "Gifts from Israeli Children" (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rami

The Linuxologist
Dec 24, 2004
8,065
#2
Man these pictures have been overplayed so much on this forum...but what I find interesting (or disturbing) in very same website you provided is this:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Secret 2001 Pentagon Plan to Attack Lebanon
Bush's Plan for "Serial War" revealed by General Wesley Clark

by A Concerned Citizen

July 23, 2006
GlobalResearch.ca

Email this article to a friend
Print this article


"[The] Five-year campaign plan [includes]... a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan" (Pentagon official quoted by General Wesley Clark)


According to General Wesley Clark--the Pentagon, by late 2001, was Planning to Attack Lebanon

"Winning Modern Wars" (page 130) General Clark states the following:

"As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat. Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said. But there was more. This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.

...He said it with reproach--with disbelief, almost--at the breadth of the vision. I moved the conversation away, for this was not something I wanted to hear. And it was not something I wanted to see moving forward, either. ...I left the Pentagon that afternoon deeply concerned."

Of course, this wholly consistent with the US Neocons' master plan, "Rebuilding America's Defenses," published in August 2000 by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC)

And, as PNAC's website ( http://www.newamericancentury.org ) notes, that the lead author of that plan, Thomas Donnelly, was a top official of Lockheed Martin--a company well acquainted with war and its profit potential.

It's no surprise that Republicans are starting to talk about withdrawing troops from Iraq; the troops will be needed in Lebanon. And maybe Sudan and Syria?

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=A C20060723&articleId=2797
 

Rami

The Linuxologist
Dec 24, 2004
8,065
#6
The Pado said:
I doubt it, Rami. Nobody in the USA seems to give a rat's behind about what happens in Sudan or Libya.
Thats why both countries were bombed IN my lifetime...
 

Rami

The Linuxologist
Dec 24, 2004
8,065
#7
The Pado said:
I doubt it, Rami. Nobody in the USA seems to give a rat's behind about what happens in Sudan or Libya.
Also I think it's clear that the American people's goals, interests, aspirations...etc is very different from it's governmet...sadly.
 
OP
Hambon

Hambon

Lion of the Desert
Apr 22, 2005
8,073
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #8
    The Pado said:
    I doubt it, Rami. Nobody in the USA seems to give a rat's behind about what happens in Sudan or Libya.
    The US is workin on the Down Low out there....Libya is a perfect spot for the US to have Bases since its location is stratigic....Plus Its got mad amounts of Oil...and dont forget Kadafy Duck who is the biggest sellout ....he is willing to do anything for them...So its in the US's best intrest to to take over Libya
     

    JCK

    Biased
    JCK
    May 11, 2004
    125,392
    #10
    Enough threads about this subjects.

    I won't tolerate any thread about the issue anymore, it will result in an immediate ban.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)