Serie A: Reggina vs Juventus [Feb 23 , 2008] (21 Viewers)

Stu

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
17,557
Stu,

the only reason you could call a foul there is dangerous play. Which merits an indirect free kick. This was never a penalty and I'm not believing this bullshit anymore.
True that. High foot = indirect free kick.

No denying the referee was crap, maybe paid off. Fucking terrible.

But we didn't deserve to win anyway. We were shit.
BS dude. We bossed the game in the second half. Not only did we have all of the possession but we played good football and created chances.
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
This cannot be considered a coincedence any more, have been systenatically robbed on purpose, we were denied 3 penalties and Reggina got a soft penalty in the dieing minutes, our year in the purgatory was for nothing, we will be treated like that, for the next decade!
 

CAPITANO

58 ' SUPER SIC ' 58
Jul 12, 2006
18,561
Just like the last time we played at Reggina penalties not for us but against us and why did Amoruso take the PK he had medical help he had to go off
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,023
Now what can i say.
Shall i give player's ratings ? Comment on our tactics ?
Why should i when no matter how we played we simply wouldn't have been alowed to win.
Every fucking time our morale is high, our chances to get closer to the teams above us are getting better and better and our rivals are in chaos , we get the man in black to fuck up everything for us.
 

serfaraaz

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2005
1,912
FUCK YOU DONDARINI...at least 2 fuckin' pk's in our favor!!!

RETIRE THE SQUAD IN PROTEST...WE DON'T PLAY IN THAT FUCKIN' SERIE A OF MY FUCKIN BALLS!!!

I WANT DONDARINI AND ALL THOSE OTHER REFS + COLLINA OUT DAMMIT!!!
we have not lost the scudetto.if inter get refreeing decisions in their favour against samp what will happen
 

Rami

The Linuxologist
Dec 24, 2004
8,065
Ya this one was fixed, three penalties the ref decided not to see, and a non existant penalty, sissoko's foul was supposed to be an indirect free kick...not one of the nine fouls.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,347
True that. High foot = indirect free kick.



BS dude. We bossed the game in the second half. Not only did we have all of the possession but we played good football and created chances.
Which is actually one of the main reasons I think it was fixed. The rules were simply changed to adapt to the result.
 

Stu

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
17,557
Yeah, indeed. I love the FSC commentators.

So Sissoko's bicycle kick attempt was utter brilliance?

Fuck off with that shit. It was dumb, no denying it. Sissoko was great until that bonehead manuever.
What Sissoko did was fucking stupid but I still don't think it was a penalty.
 

Squall

Junior Member
Nov 3, 2007
408
One thing which I don't get, is why Ranieri only made one substitution. Reggina didn't even get out of their own half, then why not swap Molinaro with Tiago or anyone else? I guess aside from the action of DP out--> Iaquinta in, Ranieri doesn't have much under his sleeve...
 

Roman

-'Tuz Fantasy Master-
Apr 19, 2003
10,778
ßöмßäяdîëя;1571840 said:
I'd rather be 3rd or 4th honestly than 1st illegally.



I must officially protest. This man's sig is much more than 4 lines long.
Are you saying that Italy won the WC not llegaly???
:lol:
 

mondo1

Senior Member
May 14, 2006
11,465
ok guys i missed most of the match.. can someone plz tell me what happend with the ref? how many pens were deneyed to us? and were they really pens?`and wtf did sissoko`? just saw his jetli kick but for me that was no pk because the player ran into him...
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 21)