Roberto Bettega (4 Viewers)

JBF

JBF

اختك يا زمن
#22
Aug 5, 2006
18,451
#22
He'll surely add something to this fucked up managment, he's gonna take that G.M role right :agree:
 
OP

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Thread Starter #25
Dec 19, 2003
96,103
  • Thread Starter
    • Thread Starter #25
    The only one of the triade who really "cared". Remember the last scudetto whne they showed all 3?
     
    Cronios

    Cronios

    Juventolog
    #27
    Jun 7, 2004
    27,412
    #27
    BIG DADDY!!! said:
    He is a Legend though why bring someone in now who has football knowledge 3 years after we started our rebuilding process?

    Maybe if he had never of been let go in the first then we would have be competitive by now!

    Though was he not seen as the weakest member of the triade?
    Click to expand...
    Because we are still run by clueless people:sergio:
    And they are committing mistake after mistake...

    True!:agree:

    Indeed, but only because the other two were very ... influental characters!
    Bettega was close to their level and we need as many men, as him as possible, to improve our efforts of reaching our pre-calciopoli levels of efficiency!

    Bettega might be the mastermind, to build everything from scratch by himself, but he knows how our team worked near the optimal levels and he can help us recreate that! Which is a HUUUUge step forward from our counter efficient, current board...


    I hope this is true, because we heard about his return in the past and it didnt happen!
     
    Lo-Pan

    Lo-Pan

    Disciple of Gonzo
    #32
    Feb 11, 2009
    2,788
    #32
    I'm very happy to wake to this news...One of the Old Boys, who actually has an idea of how it feels to be running a Proper Juve, back on Board. As mentioned above, a move to Right the Wrong, but one of several which should be analysed and likely implemented if we are to get back to being the Juve we all demand and love.

    Benvenuto a casa, Roberto...

    and I wonder where the sparks for this fire came from? Elkann??
     
    di_vladi

    di_vladi

    Junior Member
    #33
    Jul 11, 2006
    168
    #33
    OMFG 3 years jail for Giraudo ;(((( and the thief Moratti is still free and respected.

    Good news about Bettega though. It will never be the same without Moggi though..
     
    swag

    swag

    L'autista
    Administrator
    #34
    Sep 23, 2003
    83,483
    #34
    di_vladi said:
    OMFG 3 years jail for Giraudo ;(((( and the thief Moratti is still free and respected.

    Good news about Bettega though. It will never be the same without Moggi though..
    Click to expand...
    This was an interesting take on it:

    http://juventus.theoffside.com/team-news/giraudo-guilty-of-nothing.html

    Giraudo Guilty of Nothing

    I’ve got a review of the Bari game coming up probably tomorrow morning, but I thought this was well written and worth a read. In the meantime, some have read that former Juventus director Antonio Giraudo has been sentenced to prison. First, as the Amanda Knox trial shows, the Italian justice system is pretty messed up. Knowing the Italian appeals process, just like Berlusconi, there is no doubt in my mind Giraudo won’t spend any real time in prison. Full explanation after the jump from the great Giuseppe Solinas-

    Antonio Giraudo was sentenced to three years in prison today on the grounds of Association with Intent to Defraud. In a way, this is what he asked for since he has been extremely lazy these last four years. While Moggi has spent every waking day defending himself, Giraudo took the accusations all too lightly and today paid for it. I doubt that he will now knowing that it will cost him three years of his life. Odds are he will appeal the verdict but at this point I have to ask what the point is.

    The sentence itself (“Association with Intent to Defraud”) is largely unconstitutional in that it requires no proof (how could one prove ill will?). It emerged decades ago as a tactic to group undesirables (Communists, Organized Criminals, etc.) when all else failed. Today it was used as a means of achieving a desired sentence without the burden of proving a single illegal act.

    Someone now is going to have to be very creative in explaining how fraud could not be committed or even attempted (according to the sporting tribunal), yet the intention of it still be a punishable offence. Is it illogical to assume that if an association with fraudulent intentions existed that it would at least have attempted it once at some point? Is it logical to assume that someone’s mere desire to commit an act be damaging in legal terms?

    How it is possible that the “Association” does not legally exist according to the most recent Civil Court (GEA trial) yet people still investigated and condemned for being members of it is a mystery. How is it possible that the only case capable of reopening the “Association’s” existence (Moggi’s trial) is yet to conclude (which brings forth more and more evidence daily to refute the accusation) and still have people sentenced for its membership.

    It is extremely important to note that today Giraudo was sentenced not for wrongdoing of any sort but for being a member of an undesirable “Association” that does not legally exist according to the judges that preside over Italy. How could someone be a member of something that the courts themselves determined never existed?

    Today more than ever as an Italian citizen I am grateful that I live in Canada where a citizen’s right to a fair trial is still respected.
    Click to expand...
    Click to expand...
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)