Interested as to how people view the best system of politics.
Localised devolved parliaments, one party state answering to a global governance.
Localised devolved parliaments - The government distribute tax to local authorities based on population and economic importance to deal with local infrastructure, health & education - these decisions on a nationwide basis are flawed because ever community has different requirements, allowing a local government to deal with it makes sure that these requirements are heard.
Secular One Party State - Parties do nothing but distract from the needs of the state, a politician should ever be concered with the needs of his country and the needs of its people not also a political party and all the bullshit that comes with that. Politicians wages would be greatly reduced to get rid of career politicians, the only people who should work in politics are those interested in changing things for the better whilst democratically representing their constinuents; not people who get into for money or for a better job after. The state would deal with nation wide law, security issues etc. etc.
The state would be modelled on the roman republic (with the removal of certain roles ie. emergeny dictator) - There system of checks and balances served to ensure that corruption couldnt exist, follow the rules and everyone answers to everyone within the political system. There wouldn't be one leader, but two and there role is more as a speaker of the house, the majority vote is the law making role not a person.
Supranational governancee - Every state is answerable to the UN any declaration of war can only be on humanitarian grounds, via a coalition, or defence of national interests and passed through the security council, any infringment of that would result in a coalition intervention and criminal charges being brought against the leaders within the war crimes courts (everyone has to recognise it - even you America
)
What do you guys think is the best way to run it? What are the flaws in mine?
Localised devolved parliaments, one party state answering to a global governance.
Localised devolved parliaments - The government distribute tax to local authorities based on population and economic importance to deal with local infrastructure, health & education - these decisions on a nationwide basis are flawed because ever community has different requirements, allowing a local government to deal with it makes sure that these requirements are heard.
Secular One Party State - Parties do nothing but distract from the needs of the state, a politician should ever be concered with the needs of his country and the needs of its people not also a political party and all the bullshit that comes with that. Politicians wages would be greatly reduced to get rid of career politicians, the only people who should work in politics are those interested in changing things for the better whilst democratically representing their constinuents; not people who get into for money or for a better job after. The state would deal with nation wide law, security issues etc. etc.
The state would be modelled on the roman republic (with the removal of certain roles ie. emergeny dictator) - There system of checks and balances served to ensure that corruption couldnt exist, follow the rules and everyone answers to everyone within the political system. There wouldn't be one leader, but two and there role is more as a speaker of the house, the majority vote is the law making role not a person.
Supranational governancee - Every state is answerable to the UN any declaration of war can only be on humanitarian grounds, via a coalition, or defence of national interests and passed through the security council, any infringment of that would result in a coalition intervention and criminal charges being brought against the leaders within the war crimes courts (everyone has to recognise it - even you America
)What do you guys think is the best way to run it? What are the flaws in mine?
Buy on AliExpress.com
