Oh the irony - Train Driver Dies After Hitting Suicidal Passenger in Moscow Metro (1 Viewer)

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
#1
Train Driver Dies After Hitting Suicidal Passenger in Moscow Metro

Created: 29.04.2005 14:33 MSK (GMT +3), Updated: 14:44 MSK

MosNews

A Moscow metro train driver died Thursday night of a heart attack after a young woman threw herself under his train, the city prosecutor’s office told the Interfax news agency.

Around 20:15 a woman, born 1983, threw herself under a metro train in an attempt to commit suicide, at the Vykhino metro station. The young woman survived and was hospitalized with numerous injuries, a spokesperson for the prosecutor’s office said.

The 46-year-old driver, however, suffered a heart attack and died half an hour later, the agency reported.

Passengers throwing themselves under trains to commit suicide is a fairly regular occurrence in Moscow’s metro.


-----------------------------


If this doesnt prove "God" has a screwed up sense of humour, I dont know what does.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,333
#9
++ [ originally posted by Bürke ] ++
No. :LOL: It is attempted murder.

Just kidding, I think it is a manslaughter charge, but some states have different policies.
Well, I know for a fact that catholics say it's forbidden to kill anyone, and that's including yourself. It's also not right to take matters into your own hands, only God is allowed to take your life? Anyway, I don't really follow them there, but I do believe this woman should be punished. She IS responsible for the death of that driver after all. If you want to commit suicide, then don't harm other people with it. Take pills or something FFS. And do make sure you're going to die. It looks quite ridiculous to fail at killing yourself, you know.
 

Slagathor

Bedpan racing champion
Jul 25, 2001
22,708
#10
I agree completely with what you said, Seven, but the problem in the trial might be how on earth you could prove that the woman is directly responsible for the death of the driver.

As for suicide; in Holland it's not a crime but unintentional survivors are obliged to enter into extremely intensive therapy.
 

Desmond

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2002
8,938
#12
++ [ originally posted by Erik ] ++
I agree completely with what you said, Seven, but the problem in the trial might be how on earth you could prove that the woman is directly responsible for the death of the driver.

As for suicide; in Holland it's not a crime but unintentional survivors are obliged to enter into extremely intensive therapy.
Woman jumps on to track.
Train driver gets heart attack.
Train driver dies.

Hardly a coincidence eh?Besides I doubt she'd have the cheek to deny the manslaughter charge.

She'll probably try to kill herself again in prison anyway.
 

Slagathor

Bedpan racing champion
Jul 25, 2001
22,708
#13
A seemingly related follow-up of events isn't evidence, that was my point. It can be as logical as 1,2,3 but that doesn't mean it'll stand in court.

Anyway you're right. That one's a gonner.
 

Desmond

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2002
8,938
#15
++ [ originally posted by Erik ] ++
A seemingly related follow-up of events isn't evidence, that was my point. It can be as logical as 1,2,3 but that doesn't mean it'll stand in court.

Anyway you're right. That one's a gonner.
It won't be a valid piece of evidence of course,but it'll no doubt help greatly in the prosecution proving the case BRD(Beyond Reasonable Doubt).
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)