Non-Juve Transfer news (official or rumors) (57 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,948
In one go it was in the Secco days (Diego, Amauri, Melo). Makes we wonder why we have something of an aversion to it :D

Matri was the last €18m total, which it essentially was.

But seriously, there is scope for us to do this, but we buy a lot from Serie A and can negotiate teams down with various payment methods to spread the cost.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,948
Not this again :D

Asamoah we did end up paying about that for, as we honoured the initial valuation, but we haven't even bought the second half of Isla, and presumably wont pay anything like the €9m initially paid for the co-ownership.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,663
Not this again :D

Asamoah we did end up paying about that for, as we honoured the initial valuation, but we haven't even bought the second half of Isla, and presumably wont pay anything like the €9m initially paid for the co-ownership.
Uh huh. Now Jay, inform our viewers why a single or even a duo of 18 million euro transfers is not indicative of overall spending power.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,663
It cause not all transfers is straight cash bro. Many valuations are based on clauses that never get fulfilled. So we'll never know if Wolsburg is ballers, or just managed a sweet payment plan.
 

Bayernstar

Heritage of Kahn
Mar 16, 2013
1,174
Seems like Wolfsburg has more spending power than we do... :shifty:
Wolfsburg has more spending power than Juve, thats true, their usual revenue is low but they still manage to buy players like diego, luiz gustavo and maybe de bruyne, actually wolfsburg has more spending power than bayern.

They have VW as a sponsor, we have Jeep, of course they have more spending power.
VW is not only the sponsor, the clubs belongs about 90 % to VW, did you really think that a small club like wolfsburg can pay that amount of money for this kind of players? If VW wants they can pump an huge amount of money into wolfsburg, but the difference between VW for example with Etihad from manchester city is that VW is a serious company, with well-grounded structure, they try to invest sensible, but as I said they also can go full retard and spend about 100 Mio. if they want.


they try to build something really big in wolfsburg, they want to play in 2-3 years champions league and also in near future to be a big gun in germany aswell, a title contender.

VW uses football as a platform for their own business, especially for european market and also international market.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
Wolfsburg has more spending power than Juve, thats true, their usual revenue is low but they still manage to buy players like diego, luiz gustavo and maybe de bruyne, actually wolfsburg has more spending power than bayern.



VW is not only the sponsor, the clubs belongs about 90 % to VW, did you really think that a small club like wolfsburg can pay that amount of money for this kind of players? If VW wants they can pump an huge amount of money into wolfsburg, but the difference between VW for example with Etihad from manchester city is that VW is a serious company, with well-grounded structure, they try to invest sensible, but as I said they also can go full retard and spend about 100 Mio. if they want.


they try to build something really big in wolfsburg, they want to play in 2-3 years champions league and also in near future to be a big gun in germany aswell, a title contender.

VW uses football as a platform for their own business, especially for european market and also international market.
lol are you saying Ittihad is not a serious company?
 

Bayernstar

Heritage of Kahn
Mar 16, 2013
1,174
lol are you saying Ittihad is not a serious company?
its a serious company but it's different to a company like VW, it's more a one men company, build up by a rich family. Thats what I mean, therefore they can spend how much they want. And also spending that kind of money into a football club is not common.
 

jukazem

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2007
4,967
We got Tevez for cheap was it a bad deal only because we didn't spend much?

Like they say it's easy spending others money.
Tevez isn't that cheap actually. 15m over a 3 year contract aka amortization of 5m per year is same expense as 25m for a younger player on a 5 year contract again amortization of 5m per year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 36)