Mauro Icardi - ST - ***** (5 Viewers)

want him at Juve?


  • Total voters
    123
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Catenaccio

Senior Member
Jul 15, 2002
2,623
If we sell Dybala to Tottenham and keep Higuain then to be honest, we are in no rush for Icardi. We can wait until deadline day on this one. This is because Icardi won't play at Inter under Conte, he doesn't want to leave Italy and his proffered destination is Juventus.

Holding the cards on this one. If we play our cards right, we could get him for 50m or even less.
 

Juventinoo

Ertuğrul Oğlu Osman
Oct 20, 2004
2,433
If we sell Dybala to Tottenham and keep Higuain then to be honest, we are in no rush for Icardi. We can wait until deadline day on this one. This is because Icardi won't play at Inter under Conte, he doesn't want to leave Italy and his proffered destination is Juventus.

Holding the cards on this one. If we play our cards right, we could get him for 50m or even less.
we can get him as a loan with obligation to buy even
 

Orgut

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2002
12,415
Ok so we all know this is going to happen but the most annoying thing is not even signing Icardi... Its giving them Dybala in return..
Inter`s attack is 5 times better than last season because they had two players who are scorers while no providers and now they`ll have Dybala (support striker-provider) and Lukaku as the finisher type and they still have a relatively good backup in Lautaro..

- - - Updated - - -

be honest, would you let Wanda bang you with a strapon?
Wanda?! No chance.. Zaira... maybe..
 
Last edited:

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
26,028
Lautaro is better than Icardi.
Dybala is highly rated than Icardi.
We have the full rights for Dybala and his price is 70mil.
So Icardi's is what? 50? Considering the miserable phase of his relationship with Inter, which is the prime reason we are interested in him, he should come at a significant lower cost. Like 30mil?
So Icardi+40mil would be OK for Dybala?

Maybe, but considering how incompetent Paratici has proved to be, the best case scenario his typical (Kean, Cancelo) 27,5 profit.
The worst case scenario is a straight swap which would be another case of massive capital loss for our club and should be avoided at all costs, even firing Paratici at once!
 

Orgut

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2002
12,415
Lautaro is better than Icardi.
Dybala is highly rated than Icardi.
We have the full rights for Dybala and his price is 70mil.
So Icardi's is what? 50? Considering the miserable phase of his relationship with Inter, which is the prime reason we are interested in him, he should come at a significant lower cost. Like 30mil?
So Icardi+40mil would be OK for Dybala?

Maybe, but considering how incompetent Paratici has proved to be, the best case scenario his typical (Kean, Cancelo) 27,5 profit.
The worst case scenario is a straight swap which would be another case of massive capital loss for our club and should be avoided at all costs, even firing Paratici at once!
Where you got this from?

- - - Updated - - -

I wonder what the situation will be if
1. Inter complete the signing of Lukaku
2. Inter get Dzeko

How much would they need in order to avoid FFP?
 

pavelnel

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2006
980
Let us buy another attacker who cannot control a ball for more than two seconds. What could go wrong when you put on the field the deadly combo of Mandzu and Icardi, behind them maestro Bena and further behind the saint trio of Matuidi, Khedira and Pjanic?!
I can totally see this happening some day...
Better to have a brain aneurysm than watch this for a single minute..
 

vodka

55k stadium or riot
Jul 13, 2010
4,487
If image rights clusterfuck is a nono for epl teams, I wonder how it would be acceptable for inter, plus dybala would want bigger wages than at Juve.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)