Mason Greenwood - AM R - Manchester United (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
- Status
I don't care what he did at Getafe under 0 expectations. Can he handle the pressure of playing for the biggest club in Italy?
What's his resell value if he shits the bed here? There's no market for this guy. Furthermore why should we take the risk, this isn't a free transfer?
Too many fucking decisions these days are based on analytics and "potential economic benefit" when a simple eye test and optics tell you this one is a hard NO.
What's his resell value if he shits the bed here? There's no market for this guy. Furthermore why should we take the risk, this isn't a free transfer?
Too many fucking decisions these days are based on analytics and "potential economic benefit" when a simple eye test and optics tell you this one is a hard NO.
Last edited:
Please spam [email protected] that we don't want him and that's bad for image of the club
Dog's voice doesn't go to the sky unless there are plenty of them!
Dog's voice doesn't go to the sky unless there are plenty of them!
we need some plusvalenza. it has nothing to do with the quality of the players. (i'd also keep both of them.) it's just that the wage structure is unsustainable, we'll need to repay like 800m of debt, the losses are close to half a billion since covid, etc. so selling some players and replacing them with cheaper players of (hopefully) similar quality makes sense from sustainability pov
the next few years will hurt. we can laugh at inda and their finances, but ours are only slightly less worrying. and unlike suning, our owners didn't stop financing the club, those capital raises with a total value of 700m prove that. and it still wasn't enough.
tl;dr: aa's/tici's jj was a huge unsustainable mess
the next few years will hurt. we can laugh at inda and their finances, but ours are only slightly less worrying. and unlike suning, our owners didn't stop financing the club, those capital raises with a total value of 700m prove that. and it still wasn't enough.
tl;dr: aa's/tici's jj was a huge unsustainable mess
I understand we need plusvalenza while also eliminating some of the stale wages, but it doesn't make sense to me to sell Chiesa for 30M and buy Sancho for 40M just to save 2M on wages. 
If there are pure arbitrage opportunities like selling a player and replacing the player with someone on a bosman with equal ability and also reducing the wages, then sure, that makes a lot of sense. But I don't see it happening with names like Sancho.
If there are pure arbitrage opportunities like selling a player and replacing the player with someone on a bosman with equal ability and also reducing the wages, then sure, that makes a lot of sense. But I don't see it happening with names like Sancho.
- Status