Lampard to Juve? (11 Viewers)

Lamps to Juve?

  • Yay

  • Nay


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
82,841
I don't think we will sign him next summer as I don't see Ranieri staying that long.
ya i thought we all concluded at the end of th summer that lampard's gay ass was out of the question and that ranieri shouldn't get too comfortable at the helm cuz its more of a temporary gig as opposed to something to hold onto.
 

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
VDV's talent is wasted on the flank, he should be played central, behind the striker(s).
Exactly and for that position I would give a chance to Giovinco. Slowly but surely. Now I am not sure if it would be wise to have 2 players for such a position because then Giovinco´s playing time could be a lot less.

But if we were playing in both Serie A Champions League and aiming high in both competitions, I guess it wouldn´t hurt us.

P.S. Montolivo is also not the player to replace Nedved. He is not a true winger. Rosina would be a much better choice. Montolivo prefers playing in the centre.
 

RAMI-N

★ ★ ★
Aug 22, 2006
21,470
Exactly and for that position I would give a chance to Giovinco. Slowly but surely. Now I am not sure if it would be wise to have 2 players for such a position because then Giovinco´s playing time could be a lot less.

But if we were playing in both Serie A Champions League and aiming high in both competitions, I guess it wouldn´t hurt us.

P.S. Montolivo is also not the player to replace Nedved. He is not a true winger. Rosina would be a much better choice. Montolivo prefers playing in the centre.
I think even Rosina prefers to play in the center! No?!
 

Ledje

Senior Member
Sep 1, 2006
800
Gilberto Silva : 31 YEARS
Emerson : 31 YEARS

Lampard : 29 YEARS
Vieira : 31 YEARS

If you will compare on quality :

Gilberto Silva > Emerson
Lampard > Vieira

In fact we have a better midfield if you want make the comparison to 2 years ago!
 

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
68,944
why not andy?!?!?! i think he would be a terrific signing for us and he will add alot to our team.


edit: i'd rather have lampard over almiron, not to mention lampard will work well with the tinker mans way.
would he really add alot? perhaps a little more than tiago at his best, however id rather have diego simply because he more direct in his approach and more of a replacement for zizou than lampard will ever be. as for almiron, i have alot of faith in him, i believe that every player deserves time to settle after the whole scenario with iaquinta
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,941
:disagree:
Nedved's replacement should be Montolivo....
Like Dom said in another topic, Marek Hamšik is the one who can replace Nedved .
The playing style of Nedved and Hamšik is very similar. Hamšik has the confidence, speed, vision, powerful shot. The resemblance is really unbelievable. Perhaps it has to do with the Czechoslovakian football school.
He is only 20 and he already is the best and most influental player in Napoli (Lavezzi and Zalayeta depend on Hamšik's form).

But i don't know if it's possible to have both Hamšik and Giovinco in the same team, especially in Juventus. These two would be the ones creating our game and we've never had two 20/21 years olds playing two such influental roles.

I'd still prefer both of them in front of Lampard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 10)