Juventus Shirts 2019/20 (84 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Stevie

..........
Mar 30, 2003
17,759
As a designer myself I can only think of one reason for limiting the stripes. The positioning of logos, badges and crests.

We are likely to have a whole bunch of extra badges added to the one Cuadrado is wearing there.

Simplifying is the way forward. Gone are the Kappa days of maximalism and very little gestalt.

I also note how the kit is dominantly white. This is a good choice as well, as it's easier to color compliment the opposing team to a dominantly dark kit.
It makes for a clear distinction. It must be a challenge to balance a Juve kit as it is equally white and black originally.

At first I wasn't happy with this kit, but as with the logo it's something we eventually all will come to appreciate.

I do not appreciate the Jeep logo on the chest. I wonder why it must be added to the material afterwards and not designed from the get go. I would have loved to see the black square in the shirt. In the same cloth material, and then the letter logo print on top of that.
Good post.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,815
As a designer myself I can only think of one reason for limiting the stripes. The positioning of logos, badges and crests.
thats a stupid reason, see our 2016 shirt which was also made by adidas


no problem with crests and badges. and if they really worried about this kind of thing, they wouldnt have made this seasons kit with the buttons


see what i mean?
 

TheLaz

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
5,275
thats a stupid reason, see our 2016 shirt which was also made by adidas


no problem with crests and badges. and if they really worried about this kind of thing, they wouldnt have made this seasons kit with the buttons


see what i mean?
I won't discuss this here since it will take a lot of theory to explain. Gestalt, color theory and general aesthetics.

If you don't like the new shirt, fine. Don't buy it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 80)