[ITA] Serie A 2007/2008 (22 Viewers)
- Thread starter Rami
- Start date
- Status
And you concluded that on the basis of one match.
Salman,
True, but we are also loosing to many points at home, especially the last two matches, not counting the cup match against inter in this list (Juve - Udine: 0-1, Juve - Inter: 1-1 (ok, it's Inter), Juve - Samp: 0-0 and now Cagliari 1-1) so I am still concerned about it, normally, 5 points on Fiorentina should be enough, but then we need to improve.
Next week, when we visited Udinese, we will know more.
True, but we are also loosing to many points at home, especially the last two matches, not counting the cup match against inter in this list (Juve - Udine: 0-1, Juve - Inter: 1-1 (ok, it's Inter), Juve - Samp: 0-0 and now Cagliari 1-1) so I am still concerned about it, normally, 5 points on Fiorentina should be enough, but then we need to improve.
Next week, when we visited Udinese, we will know more.
Collina: Inter Penalty Was Wrong
Referee designator Pierluigi Collina has admitted that Inter should not have been awarded their controversial penalty against Empoli yesterday afternoon.
The Nerazzurri overcame Empoli 1-0 courtesy of a Zlatan Ibrahimovic spot-kick on 34 minutes.
The penalty was given after the referee adjudged a Dejan Stankovic shot to have hit Ighli Vannucchi on the hand, even though replays clearly showed that the ball had hit the Empoli star in the face.
“The episode that ended in Inter’s penalty saw Dejan Stankovic’s shot hit Vannucchi full in the face,” Collina admitted.
“Perhaps the referee was fooled because of the angle and he could have had some doubts because sometimes you see things differently on the pitch.
“But even if the ball had struck Vannucchi’s hand, it would have been involuntary given the close range.”
Inter boss Roberto Mancini admitted after the game that the penalty shouldn’t have been awarded, while Vannucchi himself revealed that the referee had ignored him when he displayed the evidence of the ball hitting him in the face.
"I felt a big pain and I tried to show the referee that my face had become purple from the shot. However he was irremovable,” said the 30-year-old.
This is not the first controversial incident involving Inter this season, and there was uproar after they were handed an equally debatable decision against Parma a fortnight ago.
goal.com
Referee designator Pierluigi Collina has admitted that Inter should not have been awarded their controversial penalty against Empoli yesterday afternoon.
The Nerazzurri overcame Empoli 1-0 courtesy of a Zlatan Ibrahimovic spot-kick on 34 minutes.
The penalty was given after the referee adjudged a Dejan Stankovic shot to have hit Ighli Vannucchi on the hand, even though replays clearly showed that the ball had hit the Empoli star in the face.
“The episode that ended in Inter’s penalty saw Dejan Stankovic’s shot hit Vannucchi full in the face,” Collina admitted.
“Perhaps the referee was fooled because of the angle and he could have had some doubts because sometimes you see things differently on the pitch.
“But even if the ball had struck Vannucchi’s hand, it would have been involuntary given the close range.”
Inter boss Roberto Mancini admitted after the game that the penalty shouldn’t have been awarded, while Vannucchi himself revealed that the referee had ignored him when he displayed the evidence of the ball hitting him in the face.
"I felt a big pain and I tried to show the referee that my face had become purple from the shot. However he was irremovable,” said the 30-year-old.
This is not the first controversial incident involving Inter this season, and there was uproar after they were handed an equally debatable decision against Parma a fortnight ago.
goal.com
- Status