Israeli-Palestinian conflict (35 Viewers)

Is Hamas a Terrorist Organization?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should there be a Jewish nation SOMEWHERE in the world?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should Israel be a country located in the region it is right now?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Jul 2, 2006
19,518
They're far superior to you when it comes to the military and they'll have support from the US and Europe if you declare war.
Their harsh reactions against civilians is showing their incompetence. A country with self-confidence don't fear from children with stones in their hands. A 'superior' soldier don't talk like ''we have to kill next generations before they grow up'' after shooting a pregnant women. The day they will lose their support will come.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

IrishZebra

Western Imperialist
Jun 18, 2006
23,327
You said the mere existence of Israel was a violation of human rights. It isn't. None of the things above say it is. Not a very good job you did there, mate.

.
Self-Determination coupled The Irgun and the Formation of Israel in the context of the original palestinean majority disagree with you.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
117,034
You still don't get it. God, you're just a kid when it comes to these things. It's as if you're not able to make an abstraction.

Look, generally I'm agreeing with them here. But posting pictures will hurt their cause. Not because I will change my opinion, but because that's what people who matter think, they think of a Turkish mob as well annoying. They don't care what they have to say, they're even a bit disgusted by them. They will listen to that Israeli official sitting next to them though.

But hey, Andy, you go ahead, you can think international politics are not decided when top officials go and get drinks.
Obviously tards will do that, Seven. But to make a stink about Rebel posting those pictures is tard-like material as well.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,453
Their harsh reactions against civilians is showing their incompetence. A country with self-confidence don't fear from children with stones in their hands. A 'superior' soldier don't talk like ''we have to kill next generations before they grow up'' after shooting a pregnant women. The day they will lose their support will come.
Okay. I'll spell it out for you. Israel tend to overreact. Imagine you declaring war. Israel will most probably overreact. You know what an overreaction means? Nuclear winter, baby.

Have fun with that, Turk.

P.S.: war = you dead (in case you didn't get the first part).
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,453
Self-Determination coupled The Irgun and the Formation of Israel in the context of the original palestinean majority disagree with you.
Self-determination is a pretty loose term and it would not be of any real use here. It also doesn't mean that the existence of Israel is a human rights violation.
 

IrishZebra

Western Imperialist
Jun 18, 2006
23,327
It's existence doesn't do that. It's actions do. And I'll agree that Israel does go against fundamental human rights.
The rules governing it's existence and inception provided a clear case of breach of peremptory norms of international law and international human rights law.


I don't wanna discuss Israel. It's just that I get pissed off when Palestine gets all this compassion for something that could have been avoided in the 1st place. If you didn't like the mouse and cobra metaphor, think of it as Balotelli diving in a Juve-Inter game and getting jeered at, and all of Italy starts pointing fingers at Juve tifosi and feeling pity for Balomerda, when he shouldn't have instigated something as big as the Juve ultras' anger in the 1st place... He might as well wear a "boo me" shirt and walk onto the pitch... Now he could label his dives as "trips" or "slipping" or whatever, but all of us, including Interistas, know he was diving...

That's the way I see it.

(Just thought I'd give this forum a homy feel with the Juve-Balo metaphor :p)
It could have been avoided if Israel let convoys of FOOD and MEDICINE into the gaza strip.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
117,034
Sent by Mr. 100%Juventus.

Does your guy know you masturbate on chicks? Keep living in your US bubble.


I dare you Tell a Jew on the street Nazi... I bet he'll fuck you up. Go and learn some manners, you little fuck. Конченные далбайоб.

P.S: You look like shit. Delete your photo from your main page, it hurts, really, you fugly gay.
What class Israel!

Israelis don't give a shit about the US. We should let them perish.
 

IrishZebra

Western Imperialist
Jun 18, 2006
23,327
Self-determination is a pretty loose term and it would not be of any real use here. It also doesn't mean that the existence of Israel is a human rights violation.
It does when the historic minority are denie this right through it's existence i.e. the people of palestine had a right to self-determine with regard to the British mandate ending. The Irgun used war crimes and all those things to bring about Israel against the right of the people of Palestine to self determine.

I'm not saying it'd be an easy Moot but the law is applicable.
 
Jul 2, 2006
19,518
Okay. I'll spell it out for you. Israel tend to overreact. Imagine you declaring war. Israel will most probably overreact. You know what an overreaction means? Nuclear winter, baby.

Have fun with that, Turk.

P.S.: war = you dead (in case you didn't get the first part).
So what will happen after Iran develop their own nuclear and then Türkiye in not so-distant future?
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
117,034
The fuck? What kind of random statement is this? I even condemned the UN last time. No, you got it all wrong. What I always say is that if you want to change something, you have to use the UN. It's the only option, but it's a slow process.
If the UN does nothing, what would you do?
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,453
It does when the historic minority are denie this right through it's existence i.e. the people of palestine had a right to self-determine with regard to the British mandate ending. The Irgun used war crimes and all those things to bring about Israel against the right of the people of Palestine to self determine.

I'm not saying it'd be an easy Moot but the law is applicable.
Yes, that's great. But that still doesn't mean Israel's existence is a human rights violation. All it means is that they have a right of self determination (which I by the way still find a particularly weak invention) and that someone is violating it. You see, the nations could co-exist. Also, it's only a minority, they don't even have to give them an own nation to preserve their right of selfdetermination.

There is no international legal court that is going to say that the mere existence of Israel is a human rights violation and that's because it would be plain wrong to say it is.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,453
So what will happen after Iran develop their own nuclear and then Türkiye in not so-distant future?
When will that be then? Wait a minute, I thought you wanted to wage war on Israel right now. What's the matter? Need some time? I bet they'll wait for you.

Aha, I guess you're a conspiracy theorist.
Well.. it's pretty much a fact.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
117,034
Umm, if anything he is the one that states this more or less the most (not they own them, but hugely influence them), so not sure why you dont think he needs to learn this.
It's pretty much obvious. All you have to do is follow the money and see that $6 billion is sent to Israel per year in the form of "aid", which is illegal by international law because Israel has nuclear weapons.

But I am just a conspiracy theorist for pointing out the obvious, others tell me the obvious.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 31)