Indeed you don't know what you are talking about to say that I lack any attempt of thinking while you didn't even check it by yourself.
Well, obviously I did check it, otherwise I wouldn't know what it was about. Then I sort of summarized the whole thing and told you what I thought it was really about, because we both know the article didn't describe itself as 'some mumbo jumbo about how people can read topmuzzie's work and interpret it in various ways', which is what I told you it was about.
So 1. I did check it out and 2. I clearly did think for myself, because I told you what the article was actually about.
Logical thinking really isn't your forte, but I guess that's sort of a given.
- - - Updated - - -
And I'm not even saying that nothing topmuzzie wrote has ever helped people in their lives. Clearly topmuzzie has been an inspiration to some. But the time has come to realise that topmuzzie's words cannot be taken literally. And that trying to figure out what topmuzzie might have meant by saying this or that centuries ago is a completely futile and finally worthless endeavour in itself.