So let me get this straight... you've been arguing for 80 pages that gays should not adopt... yet you are for gay adoption? 
And plenty of good, rational arguments have been made without any name calling, but it all ends up in the same way from the other side: comparations with pedophilia, beastiality, etc, how it is not natural, how it is against religion, etc... It is very difficult to reason when you have to explain, for example, the concept of consent over and over again.

And plenty of good, rational arguments have been made without any name calling, but it all ends up in the same way from the other side: comparations with pedophilia, beastiality, etc, how it is not natural, how it is against religion, etc... It is very difficult to reason when you have to explain, for example, the concept of consent over and over again.
