Gay Adoption (7 Viewers)
- Thread starter Sheik Yerbouti
- Start date
You hear that, fuck you China and your one child policy! 
I'm not sure I make the genetic lines for that as you do. By the same logic, people with congenital defects that make them impotent would also die out -- so by that logic today nobody should have those conditions anymore.
Some genetic lineages a dominant, submissive, skip generations, etc. It's not all direct dial.
I'm not sure I make the genetic lines for that as you do. By the same logic, people with congenital defects that make them impotent would also die out -- so by that logic today nobody should have those conditions anymore.
Some genetic lineages a dominant, submissive, skip generations, etc. It's not all direct dial.
?
Once AGAIN if we are talking natural order alla evolution those can not be taken into consideration. Your using faulty data to make your point. Natural selection would mean that humanity would die if it was strictly homosexual as a matter of fact any animal would. That's why natural order is oppossite sex
No one is saying what is supposed to be done.
My sister in law was with guys until she became 25 years old, she had four or five relationships and was never happy in any single one. Neither sexually nor socially. By the age of 23 to 25 she was single and she slowly realized that she was attracted to other women, she dated a few and felt more comfortable, she felt that this is how it is supposed to be for her. She later on met a girl that she fell in love with and they got married and they are expecting a baby in a couple of months.
Her wife on the other hand ever since she was a young girl was never with guys at all, ever since she reached puberty she tried to make out with guys, she tried to date guys but it never felt anything for her, it never aroused her and she was never attracted to guys. She did it because her friends did it not because she wanted to and not because she was supposed to. Peer pressure is strong. After several attempts she realized at very young age that she is attracted to females, she is comfortable with females and is sexually aroused to other females.
My sister in law was with guys until she became 25 years old, she had four or five relationships and was never happy in any single one. Neither sexually nor socially. By the age of 23 to 25 she was single and she slowly realized that she was attracted to other women, she dated a few and felt more comfortable, she felt that this is how it is supposed to be for her. She later on met a girl that she fell in love with and they got married and they are expecting a baby in a couple of months.
Her wife on the other hand ever since she was a young girl was never with guys at all, ever since she reached puberty she tried to make out with guys, she tried to date guys but it never felt anything for her, it never aroused her and she was never attracted to guys. She did it because her friends did it not because she wanted to and not because she was supposed to. Peer pressure is strong. After several attempts she realized at very young age that she is attracted to females, she is comfortable with females and is sexually aroused to other females.
Well, your original question along these lines was that shouldn't it be a matter of choice because if there were natural/genetic causes, shouldn't they have all perished to extinction by now.
To this point about what if everyone was homosexual, I hate to be campy about this and quote Jurassic Park twice within the same thread in the same week, but "nature would find a way." Some of the population would undoubtedly "mutate" into heterosexuals.
The interesting thing about mutations is both the mainline and the mutation play important roles in a species' survival. For example, the very thing that makes so many black people susceptible to sickle cell anemia also makes those same people highly resistent to malaria. The group value cannot be decomposed with only one set of criteria and evaluating only that in isolation.
My point here is suggesting that homosexuality has been with us for a long time, and it probably plays a social and survival role for the species, albeit not direct nor dominant.
To this point about what if everyone was homosexual, I hate to be campy about this and quote Jurassic Park twice within the same thread in the same week, but "nature would find a way." Some of the population would undoubtedly "mutate" into heterosexuals.
The interesting thing about mutations is both the mainline and the mutation play important roles in a species' survival. For example, the very thing that makes so many black people susceptible to sickle cell anemia also makes those same people highly resistent to malaria. The group value cannot be decomposed with only one set of criteria and evaluating only that in isolation.
My point here is suggesting that homosexuality has been with us for a long time, and it probably plays a social and survival role for the species, albeit not direct nor dominant.
I'm not asking for why they would want to be gay--I can say why they wouldn't want to. I want to know what makes you think that they aren't born gay. Okay, no evidence that they are and no evidence that they aren't. So the best we have to go by is the word of the gays themselves. They mostly say that's how they were born. Again, I have some gay friends and given the hell they've got for being gay, I don't think they chose that lifestyle.