I remember watching this in one of my education classes (i'm working on my B.Ed to teach) and we were talking about bullying. The teacher shows the video, and everyone in the class is super traumatized (I was the only guy in the class, small class too 20 some ppl), while I was holding myself back not to explode of laughter, she plays it a second time and this time my efforts weren't as successful as the first time and I just fucking exploded of laughter. Should've seen how the prof look at me
At my school you basically handled shit like that for the first two years, whilst the hierarchy is achieved. You find the first time you give someone a panning you don't get a lot of trouble after that.
vieri's deal in 1999 was during the time of an economic well being, in a booming market, while you are talking about 50-60m for cavani in a very critical time in which countries in europe are barely surviving in an economical sense.
You really can't compare the prices from 12 years ago and now. 12 years ago teams like Lazio, Roma Fiorentina were able to throw this kind of money. Today it's only Real, Barca, Chelsea, City and PSG.
Doesnt mean that we should weaken our first team(Bonucci) when we have built a solid core already ,just for him..Giovinco is understandable ,but we may still need him.
I mean if any of those reports are true,i dont want that oldie Lucio playing too many games.
And I will be fine with that. If we can't afford him, we can't afford him. But if we can, let's strike.
Letting go of Bonucci would be a shame, but he's not irreplacable, and Lucio/Caceres/ could do the job. Also, there might be an LB on the way in, so that Chiellini could play more often in the center next to Barzagli.
I agree with you about investing big to get a big quality striker that we can use for a long time, but 50-60m is ridicolous, I wouldnt go above 40m-ish.