"Di Canio banned for second salute" (9 Viewers)

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,749
#24
Good post, Holygr4le...

Holygr4le said:
In the long run they will have to improve drasticly!

If you compare the different leagues you´ll see that the Italian league is slipping behind in every way.

No1: Less attendees then the other big leagues. That will make Serie A less interesting in an international perspective. When the tv-viewers see that a game only has 15000 persons on the stand they automatically think that the game it self has a lower quality than a game with 60000 attendees. So it will affect the trademark.
This is undoubtedly tied in with some of your items below (safety, arenas), ticket pricing for the local market, etc.

No2: Violent behavior and controversies on the stands will not make the average customer more interested. On the contrary. Remember WC 2002 when south-Korea played. Great audience!
Though not entirely Serie A, however. I can recall how much Japanese and Korean establishments prepared for English soccer fans during WC 2002 as if General Montgomery's tanks were heading into town.

No3: The quality of the Italian broadcasts are as if there were from The Third world. You can´t even compare the quality of the productions from La Liga and especially EPL! Witch does not make it as enjoying to watch.
:D Yeah, this one is a classic. Vinman and I stopped counting how often we heard people cough into open mics. Not to mention the dead air for long periods, and only occasionally do they seem to offer something so sophisticated on their broadcasts like a game clock and scoreboard.

No4: The Arenas. Italian Stadiums looks as they are from the 2nd world war. Except some that were build to the WC -90. The commercials in the arenas looks as if the players just thru them out in no order what so ever. I wonder if any one of them even taken one single course in marketing?!
Part of this, IMO, probably has to do with city-owned stadiums. Compare with the EPL where there is the concept of team ownership of the facilities. And when you build stadiums with city ownership, inevitably they get built to hold down maintenance costs. So ultimately they look ugly and bare. But the upside? You save a few bucks because all you have to do is hire some minimum wage guy to hose the place down as a means of sprucing up the place.

It's no wonder the Champions League final would never venture down into the peninsula in this state.

Barring club ownership of facilities, however, perhaps some hopes can be pinned on Italy's Euro 2012 bid. If it could do what Euro 2004 did for Portugal, there's definitely something to be salvaged.
 

Maresca

Senior Member
Aug 23, 2004
8,235
#27
swag said:
Good post, Holygr4le...



This is undoubtedly tied in with some of your items below (safety, arenas), ticket pricing for the local market, etc.



Though not entirely Serie A, however. I can recall how much Japanese and Korean establishments prepared for English soccer fans during WC 2002 as if General Montgomery's tanks were heading into town.



:D Yeah, this one is a classic. Vinman and I stopped counting how often we heard people cough into open mics. Not to mention the dead air for long periods, and only occasionally do they seem to offer something so sophisticated on their broadcasts like a game clock and scoreboard.



Part of this, IMO, probably has to do with city-owned stadiums. Compare with the EPL where there is the concept of team ownership of the facilities. And when you build stadiums with city ownership, inevitably they get built to hold down maintenance costs. So ultimately they look ugly and bare. But the upside? You save a few bucks because all you have to do is hire some minimum wage guy to hose the place down as a means of sprucing up the place.

It's no wonder the Champions League final would never venture down into the peninsula in this state.

Barring club ownership of facilities, however, perhaps some hopes can be pinned on Italy's Euro 2012 bid. If it could do what Euro 2004 did for Portugal, there's definitely something to be salvaged.
I don´t have great hopes, even Juventus want only a 40000 seat arena, in euro 2012 it would be only place for 33000 people.
 

Akerman

Senior Member
Oct 20, 2005
864
#28
What does freedom of speech have to do with football? Football stadiums is not a place to speak out your political views. We want to forget our differences in politics, religion, sexuality and such and focus on what's happening on the field. Racism, facism and all it's peers also hurts the image of football. People that do not respect those views will avoid the sport and that is not good for the sport. We want football to be a place for joy and were everyone unites, unconditioned. If we give facists more room to express their views on the pitch and outside connected to the sport sponsors will avoid and even worse, the purpose of football will get lost.
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
#29
Cronios said:
And if SS Lazio cant stop it,
then somebody sould stop them...
To a degree yes, But if you're to blame the club, how far do you go ?
Are the club responsible for their fans?
if you are then gonna sanction / ban the club for the behaviour of its players / fans... to be frank, Serie A is fucked...

There is not one club in italy where you wont see sections of its crowd using the "roman" salute or the closed fist salute at every single match.. And yes that includes Juventus...

This isnt jus an issue for the italian federation its much more, Its about the cultural position of the italian people as a whole... This runs much deeper than football players or fans, It is embedded in italian society at every level...
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
#31
swag said:
:D Yeah, this one is a classic. Vinman and I stopped counting how often we heard people cough into open mics. Not to mention the dead air for long periods, and only occasionally do they seem to offer something so sophisticated on their broadcasts like a game clock and scoreboard.
.
It depends what your watching, whilst production of football coverage on the financially strapped RAI and Mediaset platforms is poor... The coverage of feature matches on Sky Italia is very good indeed... with its forefather Telepui being in its time the bench mark for football coverage across the globe until Sky Uk raised the bar beyond any other networks financial possibilities and as such capabilities...

The only darkness in Sky italia's feature coverage is beyond their control in that of badly designed stadiums from a media viewpoint...
 

Layce Erayce

Senior Member
Aug 11, 2002
9,116
#32
Akerman said:
What does freedom of speech have to do with football? Football stadiums is not a place to speak out your political views. We want to forget our differences in politics, religion, sexuality and such and focus on what's happening on the field. Racism, facism and all it's peers also hurts the image of football. People that do not respect those views will avoid the sport and that is not good for the sport. We want football to be a place for joy and were everyone unites, unconditioned. If we give facists more room to express their views on the pitch and outside connected to the sport sponsors will avoid and even worse, the purpose of football will get lost.
Anti-Racism is a political and philosophical view. What do we do about that? Only let open-minded views and reject close minded cuntwads from speaking out?
 

Torkel

f(s+1)=3((s +1)-1=3s
Jul 12, 2002
3,537
#34
Layce Erayce said:
Anti-Racism is a political and philosophical view. What do we do about that? Only let open-minded views and reject close minded cuntwads from speaking out?
I think you're being a bit theoretical now. Football isn't a political arena, it's a global sport. That including and tolerant behaviour towards different cultures is the norm is only natural.
 

Akerman

Senior Member
Oct 20, 2005
864
#35
Layce Erayce said:
Anti-Racism is a political and philosophical view. What do we do about that? Only let open-minded views and reject close minded cuntwads from speaking out?
On the pitch, I don't think people should be political at all. Outside of the pitch is another story. Anti-Racism-demonstrations could be good if you do it in the correct way because football is an internatinal sport and we should all respect eachother.
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
#36
Torkel said:
I think you're being a bit theoretical now. Football isn't a political arena.
Yet it is made so not only by fans / players but by the authorities with the likes of the anti-racism campaigns... You cannot have it both ways...

If the federations / bodies push cultural / political views in these campaigns then players / fans should also have the opportunity to use this stage... whether their views are right or wrong
 

Akerman

Senior Member
Oct 20, 2005
864
#37
It quite simple actually. I'm against racism but I'm also against politics in football. Though there is a difference between political views that offend and those that not.
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
#38
Not really as those views that are welcomed by the majority offend those that oppose those views...

Those views that the majority oppose are welcomed by the minority... and so on

Either way, someone is allways offended
 

Vinman

2013 Prediction Cup Champ
Jul 16, 2002
11,482
#39
I'm no expert on Italian politics, so could someone who knows more about the subject please explains his views ??

I kinda find it hard to accept the fact that Paolo is a racist, because he has guys like Dabo and Liverani on his team...and has also played with other non-white players at West Ham, Charlton, etc...

as far as I know, he has been a leader at all of his past teams
 

Akerman

Senior Member
Oct 20, 2005
864
#40
Is there really a good reason for this discussion to keep on? I would rather see demonstrations against the taunting of Zoro than the demonstrations against him. How many people would disagree with me? 1 out of 1000? Probably even less.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 9)