Cryptocurrency (10 Viewers)

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
Although I've lost money on them when I bought in 2018 and sold last April after the pandemic market dip.
Sorry man.....I love you but that made me laugh so hard and explained many of your toasts along the way

Please, for the love of god. I want you to make it and have nice returns. Once BTC goes below 30k and ETH below 1800 I want you to start DCAing fiercely and if BTC goes below 25k and ETH below 1500 you sell your TSLA and move it 50/50 into those. And then you just walk away for 3 years. Don't become a bitter copetard trying to seek validation for already failed predictions.

Sapere aude and good luck
 

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,787
Sorry man.....I love you but that made me laugh so hard and explained many of your toasts along the way

Please, for the love of god. I want you to make it and have nice returns. Once BTC goes below 30k and ETH below 1800 I want you to start DCAing fiercely and if BTC goes below 25k and ETH below 1500 you sell your TSLA and move it 50/50 into those. And then you just walk away for 3 years. Don't become a bitter copetard trying to seek validation for already failed predictions.

Sapere aude and good luck
Oh I don't care about that money at all :p. I only bought it at first because at the time I wasn't allowed to buy stock pretty much at all, so I figured why not throw a paycheck around? Wouldn't have been the first time I was wrong about something, so might as well make money off of it, right? I wasn't originally going to sell, but I was no longer on a restricted trading list and that market dip was far too good to pass up, so I moved the money from one asset to another.

One thing is for sure though, definitely won't be doing anything on Coinbase again.

For the record though, I was planning on dca-ing Bitcoin once prices (I assume will) crash, because fuck it. Wasn't going to be putting too much money into it though.
 
Last edited:

Strickland

Senior Member
May 17, 2019
5,859
what do you guys think of NFTs? according to this website (https://cryptoart.io/artists) there are 700+ artists who've sold their pieces for 100k+ which is serious money for something that ultimately holds no value, to me it's a little similar to buying those certificates of owning a star or bit of land on the moon. :D

only in case of those certificates it's usually around 100 USD, while here a lot of artwork that can be made in 2-3 hours is going around for prices like 50k-100k and more. is this some grand revolutionary idea I've failed to grasp or is it mostly made up of illicit actors who've found a fun way to launder?
 

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
only in case of those certificates it's usually around 100 USD, while here a lot of artwork that can be made in 2-3 hours is going around for prices like 50k-100k and more. is this some grand revolutionary idea I've failed to grasp or is it mostly made up of illicit actors who've found a fun way to launder?
The latter

and also the former

but mostly the latter
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,754
https://www.juventuz.com/threads/stock-market.44389/
Some members here are knowledgeable. I am not one of them of course :p

I miss when WSB was fun :sigh:
WSB was a natural part of the arc on data-driven hobbies. Sports did it big time and was one of the first. Then I started noticing how CNBC and Bloomberg were turning into ESPN. So the contextual fun of WSB and goofiness like Barstool at the time was the natural next step.

Then people realized that the individual has more skin in the game with stonks than with rapist college football players.

what do you guys think of NFTs? according to this website (https://cryptoart.io/artists) there are 700+ artists who've sold their pieces for 100k+ which is serious money for something that ultimately holds no value, to me it's a little similar to buying those certificates of owning a star or bit of land on the moon. :D

only in case of those certificates it's usually around 100 USD, while here a lot of artwork that can be made in 2-3 hours is going around for prices like 50k-100k and more. is this some grand revolutionary idea I've failed to grasp or is it mostly made up of illicit actors who've found a fun way to launder?
I think you're spot on with the naming stars analogy. Ive been using that analogy since the beginning of the year. Because as with some star-naming registry, who's to say that registry is the valid one for the star? Certainly not any alien beings around that star, and also not if someone else creates a star registry in China. Similarly with NFTs, there isn't one blockchain.

So what's to stop me from claiming my blockchain's NFT for the Mona Lisa is the correct one? This is where the cryptosexuals often fail: that there isn't purely digital when it meets meatspace. That humans are messy and not binary inputs and outputs to plug into a DAO. So we again have to defer to human systems to negotiate where the ownership really lies despite all that digital hocus pocus. This is the challenge of trying to bind a digital authentication with something in the physical world.

Worse, take a look at who is buying up these high-priced NFTs. They're not art buyers or art-savvy customers. They're all crypto millionaires. They couldn't give a rat's ass about the art: the NFT is just a vehicle for more crypto investing. That to me suggests it has often little to do with the physical asset at all. I like to joke that the big NFT buyers couldn't tell a Kandinsky from Candy Crush, and I still stand by that.

I think what's needed for art NFTs to actually go beyond failed ICO hype will have to come from what you can do with them, instead of just HODLing. If an ownership NFT gives you previews of the artist's new show, discounts on admission to their events, etc., then they might actually be useful.
 
Last edited:

Strickland

Senior Member
May 17, 2019
5,859
I think you're spot on with the naming stars analogy. Ive been using that analogy since the beginning of the year. Because as with some star-naming registry, who's to say that registry is the valid one for the star? Certainly not any alien beings around that star, and also not if someone else creates a star registry in China. Similarly with NFTs, there isn't one blockchain.

So what's to stop me from claiming my blockchain's NFT for the Mona Lisa is the correct one? This is where the cryptosexuals often fail: that there isn't purely digital when it meets meatspace. That humans are messy and not binary inputs and outputs to plug into a DAO. So we again have to defer to human systems to negotiate where the ownership really lies despite all that digital hocus pocus. This is the challenge of trying to bind a digital authentication with something in the physical world.

Worse, take a look at who is buying up these high-priced NFTs. They're not art buyers or art-savvy customers. They're all crypto millionaires. They couldn't give a rat's ass about the art: the NFT is just a vehicle for more crypto investing. That to me suggests it has often little to do with the physical asset at all. I like to joke that the big NFT buyers couldn't tell a Kandinsky from Candy Crush, and I still stand by that.
I think what's needed for art NFTs to actually go beyond failed ICO hype will have to come from what you can do with them, instead of just HODLing. If an ownership NFT gives you previews of the artist's new show, discounts on admission to their events, etc., then they might actually be useful.
for it to be an investment, there has to be a big reselling market. which doesn't really exist, most of them are bought just once and that's it. e.g. this marketplace lists the primary and secondary sales of artists and the secondary market is laughable. https://foundation.app/trending

+ there's no scarcity, I'm no expert, but to me it really seems like once you have the grasp of how you do it, creating most of them is a matter of hours or even minutes. many of the popular artists seem to be able to create 3-5-10 new works every day.

which is why the basis of it sounds like a phantom shipments scheme to me, the launderers pretend they're paying for elite artworks but most of the times they're worthless
 
Last edited:

Siamak

╭∩╮( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)╭∩╮
Aug 13, 2013
18,406
for it to be an investment, there has to be a big reselling market. which doesn't really exist, most of them are bought just once and that's it. e.g. this marketplace lists the primary and secondary sales of artists and the secondary market is laughable. https://foundation.app/trending

+ there's no scarcity, I'm no expert, but to me it really seems like once you have the grasp of how you do it, creating most of them is a matter of hours or even minutes. many of the popular artists seem to be able to create 3-5-10 new works every day.

which is why the basis of it sounds like a phantom shipments scheme to me, the launderers pretend they're paying for elite artworks but most of the times they're worthless
the fact is, it does not produce anything, it just sits there.
 

IliveForJuve

Burn this club
Jan 17, 2011
18,929
Just made my first investment in an NFT play to earn video game.

My cousin's been doing it for a month and he made a good profit. Hopefully I'm still early enough in this ponzi scheme.
 

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
Last edited:

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
Been looking into getting a mining rig, apparently you get taxed twice on it though which really kinda puts a damper on things.
This is a horrible idea for more than one reason
1) It's physically impossible (read: IMPOSSIBLE) for a regular person to take possession of a new and unused ASIC miner because the manufacturers only sell hundreds of them in bundles to commercial mining operations. What the chinese scammers will sell you is last gen tech used for 6 months already labelled as 'new' while they setup their corporate customers with the latest models.
2) You live in NY which means you are paying 10-15c/kWh for electricity whereas the commercial farms are running at 3c and...
3) still only break even after 12 months nonetheless. If your electricity isn't free your breakeven point is too far away and will move back further if...
4) the market tanks. You'll be down a lot of money for a very long time.
5) taxes and regulation could leave you with a chunk of metal with no resale value
 
Last edited:

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,787
This is a horrible idea for more than one reason
1) It's physically impossible (read: IMPOSSIBLE) for a regular person to take possession of a new and unused ASIC miner because the manufacturers only sell hundreds of them in bundles to commercial mining operations. What the chinese scammers will sell you is last gen tech used for 6 months already labelled as 'new' while they setup their corporate customers with the latest models.
2) You live in NY which means you are paying 10-15c/kWh for electricity whereas the commercial farms are running at 3c and...
3) still only break even after 12 months nonetheless. If your electricity isn't free your breakeven point is too far away and will move back further if...
4) the market tanks. You'll be down a lot of money for a very long time.
5) taxes and regulation could leave you with a chunk of metal with no resale value
My uncle has a very close family friend that mines upstate by Niagara Falls, electricity is cheap there and the mining rig would be cheaper because of the personal relationship. I'll see though, I was running a few hypothetical calculations and it would take a bit less than a year to recoup the money even if Bitcoin prices were to drop to an average of $30,000.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 10)