Btw. Was it a smart move to mention again and again that his client is in therapy and all fucked up mentally? I get it, it's supposed to be aftereffects from being raped, but still, it didn't exactly make her more credible to me.
I wouldn't stress it right now no. But the truth is he'd have a very thin line to walk anyway. On the one hand he'd have to prove she was too unstable to sign anything in 2010, on the other he'd have to make her sound stable enough to be credible.
None of that really matters anymore now, because he singlehandedly killed this case. He didn't know anything about the original agreement, referred to what had been reported as his own source several times and best of all he kept saying 'alleged' when it came to Ronaldo.
If your client is the victim, you don't say he 'allegedly' raped her. You say he raped her.
What a fucking shitshow.
And this guy is claiming the first lawyer was incompetent? Holy fuck.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk