I think Roma pay almost the same sum with Leicester offer, the difference is the structure. Leicester offer 30m cash, while Roma 26m + 4m bonuses
On that time we expect Leicester to bid for 35m (our asking price), didnt know the offer is come or not, but because Soule only want Roma, then we asked for Roma to match that 35m (that is why we get the 26+4m valuation +10% sell on clause)
The 10% sell on clause probably is our estimation of his next sale value of 50m to cover at least we get 35m from him in total
source : https://football-italia.net/soule-juventus-wait-new-offers-leicester-roma/
On that time we expect Leicester to bid for 35m (our asking price), didnt know the offer is come or not, but because Soule only want Roma, then we asked for Roma to match that 35m (that is why we get the 26+4m valuation +10% sell on clause)
The 10% sell on clause probably is our estimation of his next sale value of 50m to cover at least we get 35m from him in total
source : https://football-italia.net/soule-juventus-wait-new-offers-leicester-roma/
We have to account for the human factor too. Marotta for instance was a fabulous directour but known as a notoriously bad seller. In the long run it helps when players know you won't squeeze them like a lemon but help to find the right solutions for all parties.
Soulé for example acted very professionaly as far as I can tell so we shouldn't be the demons too. Having the money upfront would've helped ofc. But it's not a massive difference.
