They don’t have 5 years of data. It has nothing to do with that. It’s a measurement of multiple protein biomarkers that gives an overall score which can be used to predict the likelihood of vascular events like heart attacks over the following 5 years. And up to 2.5 months post-vaccination they are saying the score is still elevated predicting a higher risk. i don’t know about the PULS test specifically, but predicting heart attack risk based on biomarkers is not bullshit.
The sample size isn’t big enough from the study to be conclusive, but if the study is actually legit it definitely warrants looking into. Given that Covid itself in symptomatic cases has not infrequently led to long term heart inflammation/ cardiovascular issues, it’s not really all that surprising that a vaccine for it could cause increased risk of heart issues too. Although it still seems actual Covid infection is much more likely to do so than the vaccines.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/...ation-to-kids-is-from-covid-19not-the-vaccine
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/hea...ases/coronavirus/heart-problems-after-covid19
https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covi...ore-common-after-covid-than-after-vaccination
- - - Updated - - -
@kao ray
So there’s an expression of concern from the publishers due to problems with that study.
And then I found this, that picks it apart pretty convincingly. I knew I recognized the study authors name. He’s that lectin pseudoscience quack doctor. And at the end of the abstract he has the gall to recommend people take one of the supplements he sells for heart “health” lol. I’m not saying this study is for sure garbage, but… definitely a bit dodgy. Read through the entire group of tweets linked below.
- - - Updated - - -
Here’s the expression of concern. Yikes.