[Coppa Italia] JUVENTUS 2-0 Torino [January 3rd 2018] (2 Viewers)

[s4tch]

Why is this up to discussion? Sami got the ball first, period.

if you read the rules, you won't find anything about who gets the ball first.

it was a debatable decision. i'd probably be pissed if that happened to juve.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Bianconero_Aus]

if you read the rules, you won't find anything about who gets the ball first.

it was a debatable decision. i'd probably be pissed if that happened to juve.

Imo it was a foul. Didn’t matter anyway, wasn’t decisive as we were still winning 1-0 at the time and Torino barely had a shot at goal in that second half. The mistake wasn’t costly for them.

 

[duranfj]

it worked fine

[video=twitter;948679915993477127]https://twitter.com/Bitw__10/status/948679915993477127[/video]

Moratti would be so happy about it... now he has someone to blame for the new failure

 

[RAMI-N]

if you read the rules, you won't find anything about who gets the ball first.

it was a debatable decision. i'd probably be pissed if that happened to juve.

Really? How would you then explain the keepers not being punished for similar action?!

 

[Mark]

The message is clear from the upper echelon of Italian football. Make mistakes in Juve’s favour and pay the consequences. They don’t even try to hide it. Scum.

saw that coming a mile away.

 

[pitbull]

Really? How would you then explain the keepers not being punished for similar action?!

the keepers are different species, especially in their own penalty area. if you read the rules, you'd see that for almost every action there are 2 variations: if a keeper does it and if an outfield player does it.

I also think it was a foul, but I think Torino conceded because they stopped playing not because ref didn't whistle that foul, they easily could've avoided the goal if they continued playing

 

[RAMI-N]

the keepers are different species, especially in their own penalty area. if you read the rules, you'd see that for almost every action there are 2 variations: if a keeper does it and if an outfield player does it.

I also think it was a foul, but I think Torino conceded because they stopped playing not because ref didn't whistle that foul, they easily could've avoided the goal if they continued playing

Thanks for the clarification

 

[Hængebøffer]

Imo it was a foul. Didn’t matter anyway, wasn’t decisive as we were still winning 1-0 at the time and Torino barely had a shot at goal in that second half. The mistake wasn’t costly for them.

It doesn't look as clean as I thought after seeing it again, but I still think the ref did the right thing. He got both the ball and the player (Imo, the ball first, but in a nanosecond). But it was a normal fair tackle. Had it been reckless, it should've definitely had been a freekick.