[CL] Roma - Shakhtar Donetsk (1 Viewer)

OP
Alfio_87

Alfio_87

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2005
3,597
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #9
    snoop said:
    why? I don't see any reason to change the system..
    i dont really like all the double betting , but if u like it u can do it with ur events u set up!
     

    Snoop

    Sabet is a nasty virgin
    Oct 2, 2001
    28,186
    #10
    Alfio_87 said:
    i dont really like all the double betting , but if u like it u can do it with ur events u set up!
    you don't like it then don't bet double, but some people (including me) do like to bet double for a draw and home team win for example.
     

    Snoop

    Sabet is a nasty virgin
    Oct 2, 2001
    28,186
    #14
    Jeeks said:
    Each bookmaker chooses the way he wants to make the events. End of story.
    whatever, I won't argue about this, but his answer is simply ricidulous "I like it this way"
     

    JCK

    Biased
    JCK
    May 11, 2004
    125,445
    #15
    What is ridiculous in one expressing his own taste?

    If I tell you I prefer chicken to beef, would I be ridiculous?
     

    Snoop

    Sabet is a nasty virgin
    Oct 2, 2001
    28,186
    #16
    Jeeks said:
    What is ridiculous in one expressing his own taste?

    If I tell you I prefer chicken to beef, would I be ridiculous?
    this is not about his tatse, this is about members' taste who can have the option to choose between betting once or twice, yeah? is he doing this to satisfy his ego? or to satisfy everyone?
     
    Sep 28, 2002
    13,975
    #18
    actually someone asked about it in the other thread.

    and snoop makes sense, i mean people themselves should decide whether they want to bet single or multiple.
     

    JCK

    Biased
    JCK
    May 11, 2004
    125,445
    #20
    snoop said:
    exactly



    whatever that means :disagree:
    In reply to your "satisfy everyone", I said that no one complained about allowing multiple bets but you, and now Fli mentioned someone else. Why do you take things so negatively?
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)