Well written by some journo. This award is supposed to be given to the player who is the best in the world in particular year.
This year Messi had only one month when he was the best in the world - during the copa america and was he reaally so decisive there? 4 goals in group against Chile and 2 vs Boliwia, then great game against ecuador with 1g and 2a. Other than this, he wasnt even top 3 player in the world.
Now compare this season:
Guess who is the ballon d;or winner here.
And thats all done when Lewa was even clearer winner last year, yet they decide to not award it. Total bullshit for me.
- - - Updated - - -
Ballon D'or has no clear criteria. That's the issue. If stats are the deciding factor, then Modric shouldn't have won it in 2018. If it's not stats but team achievements, then Iniesta and Robben should have both won in 2010 and 2012.
If they were intelligent enough or just wanted to be fair, then they could have scrapped the journalists voting and came up with a simple point system that add stats, team achievements and more variables into the mix. But they're neither intelligent nor fair.
First of all, I think they should award it for a season and not year, would be much clearer to point the player of the specific season.