American NFL Football (113 Viewers)

Salvo

J
Moderator
Dec 17, 2007
62,845
Damn, Jedd must be stuck real deep down your throat :p

Play-calling could explain why the 9ers would lose a NFC-title game, a game they never came even close to playing; it doesn't explain however how a juggernaut of a team all of a sudden turns into a dysfunctional circus and half the team just decides to retire.
I did say many factors. We are talking about Roman here, he isn't great.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Völler

Always spot on
May 6, 2012
23,091
The argument here is not that he is being taken advantage of but that he simply doesn't care about the fairness of the trade when it comes to how it would affect the balance of the league as a whole.
When doing a trade, nobody cares about how it affects the balance of the league as a whole. You care about how it affects your team.

I am sure ALC perfectly well understands how unbalanced that trade is, it's just that he doesn't care as long as he's getting himself the Philly QB. That was the point.
While I too am sure that ALC knows that this deal - on paper - is a bad one, I don't see why his trade should be vetoed just because he sees some kind of crazy potential in Bradford the rest of us don't see.

This is what makes this trade ultimately irresponsible, at least at this point in the season, where we can speculate how bad McCoy or how great Bradford may or may not be.
The fact that we're speculating about how good McCoy and Bradford might be is exactly why the trade should be allowed. It's not a sure thing that this trade will turn out to be a bad deal for ALC.

To finish off - if we are gonna do something, we either do it right and are serious about it, or not do it at all.

Otherwise, I might just trade Dez for Edelman, Foster for Blount, Murry for whoever and have a basically bring the whole house of cards down. How would that be any different than the trade in question?
If you seriously think these trades benefit your team, then go ahead.
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,542
When doing a trade, nobody cares about how it affects the balance of the league as a whole. You care about how it affects your team.


While I too am sure that ALC knows that this deal - on paper - is a bad one, I don't see why his trade should be vetoed just because he sees some kind of crazy potential in Bradford the rest of us don't see.



The fact that we're speculating about how good McCoy and Bradford might be is exactly why the trade should be allowed. It's not a sure thing that this trade will turn out to be a bad deal for ALC.



If you seriously think these trades benefit your team, then go ahead.
:lol:

 

Lapa

FLY, EAGLES FLY
Sep 29, 2008
20,044
Foles for Bradford...didn't even know something like that has happened. Is it a good deal by any means, I'm not so familiar with Bradford.

--

And what's wrong with all you Americans...you are way too religious. The only reason why I really hated Foles...and will hate Bradford too.
 

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,722
Foles for Bradford...didn't even know something like that has happened. Is it a good deal by any means, I'm not so familiar with Bradford.

--

And what's wrong with all you Americans...you are way too religious. The only reason why I really hated Foles...and will hate Bradford too.
May God bless your soul!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 106)