Alexis Sánchez - Barcelona - ST (42 Viewers)

Sanchez or Pastore?

  • Sanchez

  • Pastore

  • Neymar

  • Amauri


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
His past and for us is two different things. When he turns up he can he a handful no doubt. Just annoying playing this waiting game with him & being too dependant on him. Putting aside his fitness worries.
He is never injured for long, and if we actually had a decent ss, he wouldnt be required to play half injured like freaking half of december and januari

If that tendinitis got worse, he could have been 6 months off with surgery

10m+Vucinic for Sanchez.

DO IT, BEPPE!
Sell the best forward, sounds like a plan :sergio:

"This is a club whose current turnover stands at €215M and next year we’ll set a new record high."
That is correct, if you know what it means

last financial year the turnover was 197 mil. plenty of info of that in the financial threat a couple of pages back

Current financial year, ends in june, and we received most of our income, bringing us at 215.

What will mostly be added, is matchday income for home games, winning scudetto(wich costs us more in playerbonus then we get for it), and championsleague bonus

215 means that if we ditch celtic, we'll end up a bit over 230, wich is very good. If we would get to semi's, we'd be break even, and close to 250.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
But don't you see? By swapping the ageing Vucinic with the young Sanchez, we'll have a new best forward. :klin:
Yeah, teams like city and real madrid do that. and because of that they sometimes have very expensive flops.

Its best to leave ur performing striker at the team, and get a new one for competition

who would sanchez be competing to ? giovinco ? please, then sanchez has to play the entire year half injured
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,195
Why go back to 4-3-3 when we have an overabundance of good midfielders? It would mean benching Asamoah, for example, who has been terrific. I'd rather we play 4-4-2, but over them both, 3-5-2 has more or less been getting us the results we want even when half our squad is out of form or injured. Imagine when we are full strength and with a capable poacher up front. We'd be unstoppable.
442 doesn't make sense, unless you mean a diamond. If everyone loves Asamoah as a LWB then might as well try him as a LB in a four man defense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 41)