Search results

Sorry mate.

I don't. If you have questions about God's actions, I suggest you ask God, or someone's who's met Him.

To be honest, no I don't. I don't think the Bible can be considered as intellectual proof for anything. I'd rather rely on rational thinking, philosophy, and science to try and provide arguments for the existence of God.

I think that story symbolizes the importance of having faith in God. I don't quite understand what you say after that. Yes, we are all but servants to an Almighty creator. It really does some serious damage to our ego reading that sentence? Doesn't it?

What if it was impossible to prove that 95% of the Bible is accurate? It's not exactly a trivial task. Are you suggesting this directly implies the Bible is historically inaccurate? The point I'm trying to make here is that since we cannot completely dismiss Bible's historicity, how can we...

Seven said that the Bible cannot be considered as a legitmate historical document, that it's historically unreliable. From the historicity of the Bible stems the possibility of these divine miracles that have happened. That was the argument, dumbass.

Did Jesus tell anyone to murder, rape, or torture? Thanks for proving my point. Oh, you mean the intelligent Mary question? I almost completely forgot about that, how stupid of me. You are asking whether God stripped Mary of her freewill? Sure, He did, I'd say he has the right to that to...

We're not talking about the divinity of the Bible. We're talking about the historical reliability, that's what's in question now, isn't it?

Not quite. You remember the other day when you were saying you would gladly have your set of beliefs being made fun of my someone with a little knowledge, but would be extremely irritated if it was some dimwit who had no idea what he was talking about? Kinda how I feel. Please do...

Razielist, what did atheism done? Do the words Stalin and Lenin ring a bell? You see, I will not blame atheism for the actions of these atheists who by the way weren't exactly philanthropists in case you're wondering. Instead, I hold firm my belief that the '-isms' is not the problem here.

Well, that's just shocking coming out of you.

Here's a fun fact for you. Despite Seven's remarkable arrogance and complete disregard for sound arguments for theism. He is able to make fun of religion in a, dare I say, clever manner. I am a Christian but Seven's religious jokes always seem to get a little chuckle out of me. I have to hand...

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Delphi/8449/two.html A little more relevant to the topic.

Try the link I posted in the previous page. It suggests otherwise. http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/bodily.html

The channel went out for me. Why the hell do you care?

Get educated, idiot. http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/bodily.html

Just give me a reason why I should refute historical documents that indicate Jesus' resurrection. Why should I believe that they are all wrong? Do you have proof for this? If so, please show me.

256 of them, including skeptics and non-believers. But don't bother researching the topic, instead, why don't you and drown in your little pool of ignorance?

Ow, really? prove to me that Jesus did not resurrect from the dead. Show me irrefutable evidence that all the eyewitness accounts, the Bible, independent records are all wrong. I'm waiting. Nope. We've been through this before haven't we? Genesis was never meant to be taken literally. Let...

I've had enough of this crap. When will you ever realize that this supreme arrogance of yours will get you nowhere? Stop calling religion a superstition when you have no justification for that whatsoever. You have never refuted any of the arguments I have posited for theism including the...