Search results

Just because it's widely believed that the bullet would have had to perfectly deflect and ricochet off invisible surfaces in order to trace the path/trajectory that would've been needed in order to strike the places it did...

Suuure, of course with their telescopes you can see it ;) hehe j/k man

The parts of the picture in question, highlighted:

Oops, I said it the wrong way around. There wasn't a crater when there should've been! The Lander weighed 17 tons yet the astronauts feet seem to have made a bigger dent in the dust. The powerful booster rocket at the base of the Lunar Lander was fired to slow descent to the moons service...

No, that's actually what i meant. It should be limp on the pole, because gravity would eventually drag it down. Read my earlier post... gravity is a pulling force, not a boolean decision whether something is up or down. As such, it'd drag the flag down, much like someone slooooowly pulling the...

me too ;) this is quite an interesting discussion :) Okay, think about it this way... gravity is not a "hit-or-miss" thing. If there isn't sufficient force to make the flag just go limp suddenly, gravity doesn't say "oh crap, we're not gonna try that again". Because there's no atmosphere or...

There is no way that other objects and planets are reflecting the sun's light directly in such a way that this reflected light would cast shadows onto the surface of a planet/moon. Sunlight is not cohesive like a laserbeam, and it'd quickly disperse long before it reaches the moon. It's like...

There's enough gravity to make a flag limp... and even if it doesn't make it drop at the same rate as the earth's gravitational field... since there's no force resisting the drop, it'd go limp within a few seconds. But anyway, many people have scrutinized films and photographs of Apollo...

There's no gravity on the moon? :rolleyes: Look at the exact directions of the shadows, and think about what this really should look like from a light source such as the sun...

Thanks for the pics Anders. You obviously don't believe it either, eh? ;) There's so much evidence of it being a fake, and I saw a documentary on it once. Sure, they're presented in very convincing and logical manners, so of course you're going to believe these documentaries... but even...

As if the Americans won't pay the japanese to say that they saw all that junk there :P No, they can't, because there's no valid explanation :P

Honestly, no. ;) Yep, damn funny movie :LOL: I tend to shy away from aussie-made movies, but this one was bloody hilarious :howler:

Much of the theory is based on some photographs that NASA released. These pictures appear to have either multiple shadows, i.e. multiple strong light sources, or else the single light source casts shadows of objects in different directions, as it would if it was very close. However, what I...

Also, a simple question: If Neil Armstrong was the first man on the moon... who was taking the video? :P

Maybe they just didn't think it through enough, and the natural thought process was "Flags always wave, so we'll get a wind generator in to make it look like a real flag" ;)

Why, did you see recent photos of the flag, taken by a U.S. telescope? :LOL: It's funny you should mention the flag, because that's one of the reasons why i don't believe the moon landing actually happened. If you look at pics/video of the moon landing, you can clearly see the U.S. flag...

Ahh, an interesting and highly debated point. I really do think it was a conspiracy... and so was the moon landing (dead serious). So many theories, with the Grassy Knoll, the multiple shooters. That reminds me of the super-loogie in that Seinfeld episode :LOL: "So the spit deflected off :blah:"...

This is weird Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846. John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946. Abe was elected president in 1860. JFK was elected president in 1960. Both were particularly concerned with civil rights. Both had wives who lost their children while living in the...