Search results

How you can compare a team who [played in the world cup final in 1974 and played the best football, and were generally regarded to as one of the best ever teams to one that did not even qualify from a group that included Ireland and Portugal is beyond me. Holland 2001 version sucked big time

But they did not qualify for the wc so you cannot regard them as being great in any sense

Well if we buy Stankovic then we will

Not 4 the Yugoslavs though

Only the outcome i am afraid to say on your behalf

In all the ones i have seen wc 82 was the best in terms of quality of matches, nothing comes close to brazil vs italy or France vs W. Germany, Brazil vs Argentina was gr8 as well as was Italy vs Argentina. 94 was a good tournament with good matches but no great ones the best match was probably...

Name one game that Italy actually played well in 94, yes the results were favourable in the main but the football was awful mostly:down:

Would that be because of it was held in The U.s , sweden came third, holland took part in it

And you think that 94 was better than 82 why?

with Blatter in zimmer frames

In the year 3000 they will

82 was better

[ How many wcs can you remember, please tell me

Offside you mean:D

Hear hear

Some French might find that offensive:frown:

Yes the only poor euro champoinship of recent memory was Euro96

I personally think that there hasn't been and great matches in the wc post 1990 certainly none like brazil v france in 86 and Brazil v Italy 82, germany v france 82

most of the ones i mentioned i saw play live on tv and the 70 and 74 teams i saw on video

I beg your pardon