Search results

  1. [Serie A] Juventus 1 - 1 Fiorentina, Saturday Oct 17th, 2009

    Great analysis Alen, +rep. That's why in response to some previous reviews I said that both Sissoko and Melo did not deserve a 5.5 for their performance. I think Sissoko really needs to learn how to play in the 3-man midfield. In the last match he left Grygera alone in the right side for the...
  2. [Serie A] Juventus 1 - 1 Fiorentina, Saturday Oct 17th, 2009

    Aggree on every points. + rep.
  3. [Serie A] Juventus 1 - 1 Fiorentina, Saturday Oct 17th, 2009

    Thanks for the review. Pretty agree with all of your points, but IMO Sissoko, Melo and Camo did not deserve a 5.5. Sissoko lost balls too much and also did not help the right wing enough; Melo still abused his dribbling skill and Camo did almost nothing except winning a foul.
  4. [Serie A] Juventus 1 - 1 Fiorentina, Saturday Oct 17th, 2009

    Poulsen was our best players, following by our two centre backs. However I voted for Ferrara, because he was the one who made Poulsen look that good
  5. [Serie A] Juventus 1 - 1 Fiorentina, Saturday Oct 17th, 2009

    Indeed, besides that beautiful pass he won many 1-on-1 challenges, helped controlling the tempo in the midfield and even drifted out to help consolidate our left wing. His other matches were so bad, however.
  6. [Serie A] Juventus 1 - 1 Fiorentina, Saturday Oct 17th, 2009

    Yes, and that was even worse than the 4-4-2. In fact I don't like the way Ferrara made that late tatical changes. There was so little time for the players to adjust to the change to make any impact.
  7. [Serie A] Juventus 1 - 1 Fiorentina, Saturday Oct 17th, 2009

    When played with the 4-3-2-1, we were so vulnable on the wings and when switched to 4-4-2 we were painfully slow in attack and also were't able to control the tempo or hold possesions.
  8. [Serie A] Juventus 1 - 1 Fiorentina, Saturday Oct 17th, 2009

    Very disappointing result. With the current players we could have done much better than that. Again, questionable coaching decisions (substitutions, tactical changes) cost us points.