Search results

Stephen, not Steven. Listen you are obviously a contentious little tadpol (prick) so I keep this simple: Blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa. Heehaw

Don't you mean grammbaa!

Why would I care if that were proven to be true, the mythical "we" who claim to be the voice of these pages are rather pathetic would be sheep.

Oh, who be the "we" then? Your language is as futile as it is mostly profain and hollow.

Heehaw. You can't write to save your life.

Spake was a direct quotation, gave a simple human error, you silly boy.

You are trying too hard to make a name for yourself on these pages, by the way great name. Please point out the jargon I used.

You would only gave players in your side who could keep possession, except those who you like. But Ronaldo who can keep possession you would punch in the head, along with Eto'o!

I prefer many of their players too. Judgements are made in opinions, afterall we are not in a nunnery.

Doesn't one make judgements in a debate?

What is a cotney?

Sorry, just noticed your from Manchester: lame must be in vogue word.

Great joke. Can't believe your wit.

Of course they are interesting to watch: if you don't enjoy this attacking team then you have no real feel for football. They are playing out and out great football. I support Juve, but that doesn't mean I find the way we play exciting, in fact it is all a bit ploddingly competent.

If we lose it is not so bad. We will still qualify. We can't qualify early as we are at the end: ipso facto: let's play our best team.

Stop farting around, if you have a point make it.

A strange definition of very different. I think you are flogging a dead horse.

Spot on. Ah, but the wind. Heehaw

Don't be a silly Billy, but the conditions at the moment are not that drastically different. Look it up if you must.

Just like the wind coming off the Alps.