Search results

well thanks, i dont usually get such polite answer from someone who disagrees with me :tongue:

Why

yeah, that translates in annual turnover, and win/loss. Currently, its far to low, and at loss. at the end of this year its still gonna be far to low. for the purchases you desire, the turnover needs to be 250+. we were at 197 and might end this time at 230. the year after we should get to...

Sup - - - Updated - - - but i agree on that, we just cannot want it right now. we have a poor 197mil turnover, we need to raise that significantly. people talk about milan and balol, wel they sold their best 2 players and ran a 267 mil turnover that year ! if we can get to 267 mil, without...

exactly, you assume marotta decides his own budged. thats where all of you are wrong. the board does - - - Updated - - - funny, i ask how would you do it, and you just evade the question and insult me. the truth is, you want the impossible from marotta, totally dont have a clue how he should...

Please explain me for what fee, and what wage, we can get suarez. tell me this before mocking the great man

i tought chelsea had agreement to buy so shaktar would try harder to win against us

for the affro

i see relativism finally got into you, and you realise we cant get him. net 6.25mil pounds ? thats 7.3 mil euro For him to move, he'll demand a better offer, close to 10mil, thats 20 after tax. no, we cannot afford that now. we need that ~350mil turnover instead of current 197.

tell me what exact NET(before tax) wage suarez is on at pool right now

Sure thing bro, will you provide the 40mil fee and 12 mil wages ?

Took out the pathetic bitching and replaced it with some goddamn sense. - - - Updated - - - He's promising, and the only realistic young talented ss that can score goals we can get. Should definatly not overpay what those who overrated him would

moar hate, moar

Jovetic proved more on the big stage then giovinco, beeing with the viola rats and he hasent recovered form after the injury Villa is looking not bad, but playing a sidestriker role. not his position Sanchez, should be good, but is not played the correct way Muriel, oh who the fuck that might...

They are all exponentially better then giovinco, they are decisive but you are right about the second part

Those words exactly, we should aspire to, yes, if the opportunity arises. But there isnt a "need" to get an ss better then vucinic. There is a need to look around for opportunities, that are financially acceptable, and can strenghten our team now or in the future. From that list, only jovetic is...

someone please explain me why we got 45 mil :lol: and what is the wage budged for this SSµ and yes, we have vucinic and giovinco, we should totally need a new SS :lol: