Search results

Especially if he's used in a rotation system with Del Piero and Huntelaar.

Yes.

Wasn't that a Kuffour own goal?

Not official yet? Good.

Iaquinta is an ok signing ONLY if he's used as a rotation player. As a regular starter he's not cutting it.

No. It means we're signing an average player.

Iaquinta didn't do anything in the WC. He was used as a counter attacking outlet late in games but the only useful thing he ever did was score against Ghana because Kuffour fucked up. He's not versatile, just average in two positions.

Yes. Zalayeta > all of our strikers easily. He owns Trezeguet.

Pizarro? 28 :)

So he's definitely ours? I hope not, never been a fan of him. He would be a decent sub but I have a bad feeling he'll be a starter if he comes. As Andy said a page ago, Pizarro is better and he's free. In order of preference: 1. Pizarro 2. Huntelaar 3. Iaquinta

Del Piero >>>>>>>>>>> Iaquinta

Don't let Nedved hear you.

It's not that he's not good enough, we just don't need him. He's a wing back/wide midfielder, usually on the right, and we already have more than enough players for those positions. Deschamps is right. What the hell are we going to do with Marchionni, Camo, Salihamidzic AND Mesto?

Iaquinta sucks. :)

Things just keeping getting worse. First we lose Frings and now we're close to Iaquinta. :sad: