Search results

  1. [SERIE A] JUVENTUS 3-3 Chievo (April 5th 2009)

    it's fckinnnnnnnnnnnnnng flipped

  2. [SERIE A] JUVENTUS 3-3 Chievo (April 5th 2009)

    If I write in bold, I win the argument.

  3. [SERIE A] JUVENTUS 3-3 Chievo (April 5th 2009)

    Looking on the bright side, we most likely would not have won the Scudetto either way and this loss shows the management that we desperately need new defenders, more than anything.

  4. [SERIE A] JUVENTUS 3-3 Chievo (April 5th 2009)

    Great.

  5. [SERIE A] JUVENTUS 3-3 Chievo (April 5th 2009)

    As much as I'd like to, I won't touch Nocerino. Nocerino's a very limited footballer. A poor man's Sissoko. Whatever he might turn into in the future, let him do it elsewhere.

  6. [SERIE A] JUVENTUS 3-3 Chievo (April 5th 2009)

    Then it would have to be: Silva - Marchisio - Sissoko - Giovinco. Could work, but I don't think Ranieri would play with two midget wingers.

  7. [SERIE A] JUVENTUS 3-3 Chievo (April 5th 2009)

    Double irony? With Camoranesi and Nedved in their prime, it could work. Now they don't have the lungs anymore. With Marchisio instead of Camo then yes, it's the best we can field now.

  8. [SERIE A] JUVENTUS 3-3 Chievo (April 5th 2009)

    That midfield is the one we had against Bate Borisov away. Worked wonders.

  9. [SERIE A] JUVENTUS 3-3 Chievo (April 5th 2009)

    No, probably not.

  10. [SERIE A] JUVENTUS 3-3 Chievo (April 5th 2009)

    Palladino looked good for a few games too. Not to mention Nocerino.